Women's Marches

[The Dude]

Kind of surprised Madonna's terroristic threat wasn't bigger news.

[Moiraine]

Kind of surprised Madonna's terroristic threat wasn't bigger news.

 

It was, but there's lots of big news. It was on front page of CNN.com and I heard it on the radio.

 

I can't stand her and don't get why they would invite her. All she carea about is herself. She doesn't care about this movement. It's another way for her to get attention.

[The Dude]

I didn't even hear about it until today. Seems like that would be the type of thing that would be unavoidable.

[mrandyk]

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

[NM11046]

 

Slate taking the NYT to task for article celebrating the dads who stayed home to parent while moms went to march: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2017/01/23/dads_don_t_deserve_praise_for_parenting_while_mom_marches_against_trump.html

 

The article cast a bewildered, anthropologically inquisitive, peak-NYT gaze on the most mundane activities of parental life. Fathers reheated leftover pizza, dressed their children in winter coats, and played with their kids at parks—without help from their wives! This could have been a story about the life of any single parent, primary caregiver, or parent whose partner is away for a weekend. Almost every parent outside the 1 percent has days where he or she must parent, unremarkably, alone. But because the parents of Montclair were men who usually have women around, Bondy gave every banal duty of parenthood the weight of a superhuman feat.

 

One of the best signs in Boston (tried unsuccessfully to find a picture) was a man holding: "I'm Here Because She's Working (supporting our family)"

[commando]

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

well...she did say she was going to blow everyone who voted for hillary. if she is already done with all that blowing she can probably blow down the white house

[Moiraine]

 

 

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

well...she did say she was going to blow everyone who voted for hillary. if she is already done with all that blowing she can probably blow down the white house

 

Eww no wonder Clinton lost.

[RedDenver]

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

Yes, and it's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The only way it's not protected is if it can be proved that she intended to actually commit the act (or intended to incite others to do so).

[cornstar]

 

 

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

Yes, and it's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The only way it's not protected is if it can be proved that she intended to actually commit the act (or intended to incite others to do so).

Not sure about that. Hopefully the FBI or Cia pays her a visit.

[RedDenver]

 

 

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

Yes, and it's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The only way it's not protected is if it can be proved that she intended to actually commit the act (or intended to incite others to do so).

Not sure about that. Hopefully the FBI or Cia pays her a visit.

 

Go look online for an 1st Amendment lawyer analysis on the situation. Hyperbolic and vitriolic speech is definitely protected.

[Moiraine]

 

 

 

 

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

Yes, and it's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The only way it's not protected is if it can be proved that she intended to actually commit the act (or intended to incite others to do so).

Not sure about that. Hopefully the FBI or Cia pays her a visit.

Go look online for an 1st Amendment lawyer analysis on the situation. Hyperbolic and vitriolic speech is definitely protected.

 

It's probably still okay for them to interview her.

[Husker Red Til Dead]

 

 

 

 

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

Yes, and it's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The only way it's not protected is if it can be proved that she intended to actually commit the act (or intended to incite others to do so).

Not sure about that. Hopefully the FBI or Cia pays her a visit.

Go look online for an 1st Amendment lawyer analysis on the situation. Hyperbolic and vitriolic speech is definitely protected.

 

It's probably still okay for them to interview her.

 

I agree

[RedDenver]

 

 

 

 

 

She said she has "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House"? Can you really say that?

Yes, and it's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The only way it's not protected is if it can be proved that she intended to actually commit the act (or intended to incite others to do so).

Not sure about that. Hopefully the FBI or Cia pays her a visit.

Go look online for an 1st Amendment lawyer analysis on the situation. Hyperbolic and vitriolic speech is definitely protected.

 

It's probably still okay for them to interview her.

 

I agree

 

If they just want to be sure she's exaggerating for effect, that's fine. If the government tries to intimidate her into silence, then I'm against it.

[Moiraine]

 

 

The UNL chapter stood on their balcony, harassing participants of the women's march, yelling "no means yes" and "grab them by the pu&&y" as well as discussing whether or not they'd f#*k specific women.

[mrandyk]

 

 

The UNL chapter stood on their balcony, harassing participants of the women's march, yelling "no means yes" and "grab them by the pu&&y" as well as discussing whether or not they'd f#*k specific women.

 

Deplorables.