Trump Legal Troubles

[JJ Husker]

5 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

Can we at least agree that this case alone would have derailed any political career in our previous lifetime? 

This^^^

In this current life it will only make hardcore Trump supporters more hardcore. They’re such wonderful people.

[Goal-line]

13 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

You said rape charge needed DNA evidence.   This trial had an option for a rape verdict yet neither side was able to talk about DNA evidence in the trial because of a prior agreement.   So which is it, does a liable for rape verdict need dna evidence or not?   

Yes, I believe the evidence for rape requires a higher bar, based on the definition of New York law.

[Archy1221]

10 hours ago, Goal-line said:

Yes, I believe the evidence for rape requires a higher bar, based on the definition of New York law.

A higher bar, or dna evidence?  If it’s dna evidence, why was rape even an option for an outcome if neither side was able to talk about it or bring up dna evidence? 

[commando]

10 hours ago, Goal-line said:

Yes, I believe the evidence for rape requires a higher bar, based on the definition of New York law.

remember who you are talking with.   he will defend Donnie to the death.    

[Archy1221]

5 minutes ago, commando said:

remember who you are talking with.   he will defend Donnie to the death.    

You could also remember what the conversation is about  Trying to figure out if a rape charge in civil court needs dna evidence or not for a liable for rape verdict really isn’t defending anyone.   Kinda shocked you don’t know that

 

Since he’s not my candidate for 2024, it’s better for me that he goes away    

[knapplc]

Imagine arguing that he "only" was found liable for sexual assault and not rape, as if that makes it better.

 

[knapplc]

This is why he wasn't found liable for rape. She couldn't confirm exactly what he did to her. No penis insertion, no rape, per NY law (which is dumb, but whatever).

 

 

[funhusker]

2 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

You could also remember what the conversation is about  Trying to figure out if a rape charge in civil court needs dna evidence or not for a liable for rape verdict really isn’t defending anyone.   Kinda shocked you don’t know that

 

Since he’s not my candidate for 2024, it’s better for me that he goes away    

Why would it be better?  Would you actually consider voting for him if he doesn't?

 

Seems like if the GOP is still what you claim it to be, he wouldn't have a chance.  But I think we all know you are clinging to something that doesn't exist and at the same time are happy doesn't; at least according to posts about being glad the party of McCain, Romney, Bush, etc is gone.

[Archy1221]

5 hours ago, knapplc said:

Imagine arguing that he "only" was found liable for sexual assault and not rape, as if that makes it better.

 

That would be crazy if someone here was doing that. 

[Archy1221]

5 hours ago, funhusker said:

8 hours ago, Archy1221 said:

 

Why would it be better?  Would you actually consider voting for him if he doesn't?

For the eighth time now, no 

[Archy1221]

5 hours ago, funhusker said:

at least according to posts about being glad the party of McCain, Romney, Bush, etc is gone.

Yep.   Forgive me that the war machine isn’t in charge still and being fine with that

[suh_fan93]

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

2 hours ago, suh_fan93 said:

 

 

 

For his entire adult life, Donald Trump has said and done whatever he wants, and relied on a stable of attorneys to delay, mitigate and avoid consequences. Most of us don't have the opportunity to work that way, and most of us wouldn't be such a$$h@!es in the first place. 

 

So what is it about this guy? I think some people see a guy flexing his wealth and power and consider it enviable and admirable. 

[BigRedBuster]

 

[BigRedBuster]