SouthLincoln Husker Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 38 minutes ago, JoeSakic2019 said: They added the felony because child porn is a felony! They did not just add fake charges. Don't get crazy on me. I just said that they had to add a felony to extradite. Neither of us knows the whole truth. Quote Link to comment
Head Coach Scott Frost Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 I would have thought the people of California, who constantly complain about an incarceration crisis, would not look to destroy a long man's life over a text. What he did was gross, but this is such an overreach. 5 1 2 Quote Link to comment
PasstheDamnBallGuy Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 2 hours ago, Head Coach Scott Frost said: I would have thought the people of California, who constantly complain about an incarnation crisis, would not look to destroy a long man's life over a text. What he did was gross, but this is such an overreach. Well if there is one thing the state of California is good at its overreach. 1 Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 12 hours ago, SouthLincoln Husker said: Don't get crazy on me. I just said that they had to add a felony to extradite. Neither of us knows the whole truth. I think it's important to clarify that this is "child porn" by the letter of the law and that's the primary reason it's listed. Perhaps the felony charge aids in extradition, but it would likely not have been added for that explicit purpose. I've mentioned this before in this thread, but most prosecutors will charge as many crimes as possible knowing full well that many of them may not stick or might get plead down. It's a lot like bartering. Both parties shoot their shot and then you find some amicable settling point. Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 3 hours ago, Enhance said: I think it's important to clarify that this is "child porn" by the letter of the law and that's the primary reason it's listed. Perhaps the felony charge aids in extradition, but it would likely not have been added for that explicit purpose. I've mentioned this before in this thread, but most prosecutors will charge as many crimes as possible knowing full well that many of them may not stick or might get plead down. It's a lot like bartering. Both parties shoot their shot and then you find some amicable settling point. I realize that, but it was implies that I thought it was a fake charge. A felony is serious, even though I think its a reach. But I'm not an attorney or a judge. Quote Link to comment
4skers89 Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 It will be hard to beat this rap when it’s the people of the state of California vs. Mo. Doesn’t seem fair. 1 Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, 4skers89 said: It will be hard to beat this rap when it’s the people of the state of California vs. Mo. Doesn’t seem fair. That's how all criminal prosecutions are labeled. It's whatever entity has jurisdiction over the law, enforcing the law. It's no different than a citizen at a traffic stop - it's them vs. the Police. That's not just fair, it's the best way to enforce laws. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 17 hours ago, Head Coach Scott Frost said: I would have thought the people of California, who constantly complain about an incarnation crisis, would not look to destroy a long man's life over a text. What he did was gross, but this is such an overreach. A literal and factually based assessment is not an overreach. If he did what is alleged to have done, then that is truly a felony per the law itself. Then you take into account context, and he will likely plead to probation/diversion/misdemeanor/something minor and not serious. There's no overreach anywhere. Also, what exactly is an incarnation crisis? Too many deities embodying humans in California? 2 1 4 Quote Link to comment
4skers89 Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 38 minutes ago, knapplc said: That's how all criminal prosecutions are labeled. It's whatever entity has jurisdiction over the law, enforcing the law. It's no different than a citizen at a traffic stop - it's them vs. the Police. That's not just fair, it's the best way to enforce laws. Either your stupid humor detector is malfunctioning or you felt clarification was necessary before someone started a “Nebraskans against California” group. 2 Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 I will be glad when this is over. Too many people know, but really don't know what actually happened. Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Speculation is the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. Allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof. Quote Link to comment
NWHuskerfan Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 My prediction this won’t end well. 1 Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 15 hours ago, NWHuskerfan said: My prediction this won’t end well. Legal precedent suggests otherwise, so it would be interesting to hear why you feel this way. 3 Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 Obviously things did not go as planned, or I think we would have heard he was back in town by now. Unless I missed that. 1 Quote Link to comment
TwitterAcronymExperty Posted March 18, 2019 Share Posted March 18, 2019 9 minutes ago, skersfan said: Obviously things did not go as planned, or I think we would have heard he was back in town by now. Unless I missed that. It's spring break, right? Maybe he stayed in Cali? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.