knapplc Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 Courtesy of Bill Connelly, ESPN Connelly states, correctly, that for years all we've done is looked at raw numbers of starters returning for each team. That's flawed in a few ways, so he's taken a different approach: "As a remedy for this, I have for a few years been deriving what I call a team's returning production percentage as an alternative to returning starters. It looks at the most predictive key personnel stats -- percentage of your QB's passing yards returning, percentage of your secondary's passes defensed returning, and everything in between -- and is weighted based on what correlates most strongly with year-to-year improvement and regression. It is a major factor in my annual SP+ projections, which will be released next week. (The other primary factors: recent recruiting and weighted five-year history.)" College football teams with the most returning production in 2020 Returning Production for 2020 Team Overall Offense (Rank) Defense (Rank) 1. Northwestern 84% 88% (6) 80% (23) 2. Georgia Tech 84% 74% (39) 94% (2) 3. Houston 83% 73% (42) 93% (3) 4. ECU 83% 87% (8) 79% (26) 5. USC 82% 77% (25) 87% (7) 6. Virginia Tech 82% 74% (36) 89% (5) 7. ODU 81% 80% (19) 83% (10) 8. UAB 81% 82% (14) 80% (20) 9. Oklahoma State 80% 75% (34) 86% (8) 10. Rice 79% 63% (70) 96% (1) 11. Indiana 78% 74% (37) 82% (13) 12. Illinois 78% 86% (11) 71% (46) 13. Louisville 78% 79% (21) 77% (31) 14. Akron 78% 89% (3) 66% (57) 15. Rutgers 78% 76% (29) 79% (25) 16. Texas A&M 77% 80% (17) 74% (37) 17. Nebraska 76% 92% (2) 59% (82) 18. North Carolina 75% 87% (9) 64% (63) 19. Coastal Carolina 75% 88% (5) 62% (69) 20. Purdue 74% 76% (32) 73% (40) 21. Texas 74% 66% (62) 82% (14) 22. Ball State 74% 68% (60) 81% (19) 23. NC State 74% 81% (15) 67% (56) 24. CMU 73% 70% (48) 77% (30) 25. Kentucky 73% 68% (56) 78% (27) That's six Big Ten teams in the top 25, with four in our division. Illinois & Northwestern are ahead of Nebraska, and Purdue is a few spots behind the Huskers. Other Big Ten teams: 34. Wisconsin 47. Penn State 86. Minnesota 89. Maryland 92. Ohio State 100. Iowa 116. Michigan State 124. Michigan 1 Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 Man, for NW this could be a bad thing...that offense SUCKED. 6 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, teachercd said: Man, for NW this could be a bad thing...that offense SUCKED. For sure - 88% of their offense production from last year is like 50% of a real offense's production. Curious what a new coordinator can do there, but no one on their offense jumps out as even an average big ten player. 1 Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 You only want back players who are good....with that said I enjoy these articles but disagree on the % and what really matters. 1 Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 Based on many notable teams being left off this ranking, I'm gonna say this particular metric doesn't mean squat when it comes to predicting anything. Bama, Clemson, tOSU, Oklahoma....none of them in the top 25 but I'd bet they'll be just about as good as usual and the teams on this list will also be about as good as they usually are. Quote Link to comment
caveman99 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 Wow, 92% returning on Offense. That is pretty good, I like their chances to be good on that side of the ball this year with what they added in recruiting as well. 2 Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 I was gonna call BS on having 92% offense returning. But I think that's right. We had around 5,000 total yards, and we lose Mo Washing and Wyatt Mazour. (Anyone else?) They accounted for around 300 yards. Not sure how big a chunk of our points those two accounted for. 1 Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 On 2/8/2020 at 9:10 AM, NUance said: I was gonna call BS on having 92% offense returning. But I think that's right. We had around 5,000 total yards, and we lose Mo Washing and Wyatt Mazour. (Anyone else?) They accounted for around 300 yards. Not sure how big a chunk of our points those two accounted for. Noa, Williams, and Woodward. They too they had little production. 1 Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted February 11, 2020 Author Share Posted February 11, 2020 The real losses for Nebraska are going to be the Davis twins & Darrion Daniels - basically the entire D Line. Into those shoes you're going to have Ben Stille, Damien Daniels and Deontre Thomas, right? We'll see how it goes with another year in S&C. 3 Quote Link to comment
84HuskerLaw Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 The Davis twins played fairly well but werent real big difference makers (except a few real negative penalty cases that I recall). I hope they get a chance in the pros but their not going down as Husker legends. I tend to think the next guys up have a chance to fill their shoes quite well. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 52 minutes ago, knapplc said: The real losses for Nebraska are going to be the Davis twins & Darrion Daniels - basically the entire D Line. Into those shoes you're going to have Ben Stille, Damien Daniels and Deontre Thomas, right? We'll see how it goes with another year in S&C. Yeah, I'm a bit worried about our D-line too. But sometimes you just can't tell when someone else will step up--or other positions will compensate. Remember when Vincent Valentine and Maliek Collins both bailed out on their senior year to enter the 2016 NFL draft? I thought that would kill us. But we ended up going 9-4 in 2016 without Valentine / Collins after a mediocre 6-7 record in 2015 with both of them. So you never can tell. :shrug: 1 Quote Link to comment
runningblind Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, NUance said: Yeah, I'm a bit worried about our D-line too. But sometimes you just can't tell when someone else will step up--or other positions will compensate. Remember when Vincent Valentine and Maliek Collins both bailed out on their senior year to enter the 2016 NFL draft? I thought that would kill us. But we ended up going 9-4 in 2016 without Valentine / Collins after a mediocre 6-7 record in 2015 with both of them. So you never can tell. :shrug: The d line has got to be stout to allow the LBs, and the defense as a whole, to function. Time for Ty Robinson, Mosai Newsome etc to step up and be Big Ten quality guys. Quote Link to comment
Undone Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Relative to the many other problems this team had as it finished the 2019 season, the defensive line is almost last on the list for me. I'm not worried about it at all, really. The narrative is that we had no pass rushing linebackers last year. So as far as returning production in that department goes, Alex Davis didn't really do anything at all the entire season and then he graduated. Somebody has to step up there or we'll have more situations where mediocre quarterbacks stand in the pocket all game and drive down the field on us (with the Purdue game as a great example). 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.