Jump to content


D Line Recruits


Recommended Posts

 

Collin Miller got an offer. Get him.

Kid exploded skill wise and measurably his senior year. Really would like him at DE. Same school as RG4 and his interest in us is legit.

 

 

I like the look of this kid a lot. Good size and frame and athleticism.

 

I still think we need a DT though. Or is that a position Ivy can cover?

Link to comment

 

 

Collin Miller got an offer. Get him.

Kid exploded skill wise and measurably his senior year. Really would like him at DE. Same school as RG4 and his interest in us is legit.

 

 

I like the look of this kid a lot. Good size and frame and athleticism.

 

I still think we need a DT though. Or is that a position Ivy can cover?

 

 

McMullen and Maurice along with the freshmen

Link to comment

 

 

 

Collin Miller got an offer. Get him.

Kid exploded skill wise and measurably his senior year. Really would like him at DE. Same school as RG4 and his interest in us is legit.

I like the look of this kid a lot. Good size and frame and athleticism.

 

I still think we need a DT though. Or is that a position Ivy can cover?

No. Ivy is a pure DE.
Link to comment

Is there any chance that Nebraska tries to get back in with some of the local guys?

 

Damon Benning keeps hoping for an offer for Elijah Wilson from Central:

https://rivals.yahoo.com/nebraska/football/recruiting/player-Elijah-Wilson-170648

 

And I think Sam McKewon was impressed with David Englehaupt:

https://rivals.yahoo.com/nebraska/football/recruiting/player-David-Engelhaupt-167009

 

Both seem like developmental type prospects, could put on some weight and be strongside end/3-tech options.

Link to comment

I think that you look at the situation...

 

Collins: Probably a high draft pick

 

VV: Graduated...been hurt before a few times.

 

I think when you look at the facts you have to assume there is a good chance that both would leave but one for sure. I think if you lose one you need to bring one in. If you lose two you better bring two in.

Link to comment

Reports are we had decided not to recruit any DTs for this class but may be doing some last-minute looking now that Collins and Valentine are gone.

I don't get this logic at all. Regardless if those 2 decided to leave or not, you recruit DT's for the future not for the next year. After this year there are only 4, would be awfully nice to have a RFr. Be ready to add depth in 2017 as the 5th DT.
Link to comment

 

Reports are we had decided not to recruit any DTs for this class but may be doing some last-minute looking now that Collins and Valentine are gone.

I don't get this logic at all. Regardless if those 2 decided to leave or not, you recruit DT's for the future not for the next year. After this year there are only 4, would be awfully nice to have a RFr. Be ready to add depth in 2017 as the 5th DT.

 

 

I'm sure the staff sees a bigger depth issue then DT and might be happy to save a couple scholarships for the 17 cycle. Us fans don't see any upperclassmen with experience after this year - so we as fans seem concerned. The staff knows what they have in the young guys and it must be GOOD!!!

Link to comment

 

 

Reports are we had decided not to recruit any DTs for this class but may be doing some last-minute looking now that Collins and Valentine are gone.

I don't get this logic at all. Regardless if those 2 decided to leave or not, you recruit DT's for the future not for the next year. After this year there are only 4, would be awfully nice to have a RFr. Be ready to add depth in 2017 as the 5th DT.

 

 

I'm sure the staff sees a bigger depth issue then DT and might be happy to save a couple scholarships for the 17 cycle. Us fans don't see any upperclassmen with experience after this year - so we as fans seem concerned. The staff knows what they have in the young guys and it must be GOOD!!!

 

 

We have 22 seniors plus any other attrition.

 

There's no need to save any spots.

Link to comment

 

 

 

Reports are we had decided not to recruit any DTs for this class but may be doing some last-minute looking now that Collins and Valentine are gone.

I don't get this logic at all. Regardless if those 2 decided to leave or not, you recruit DT's for the future not for the next year. After this year there are only 4, would be awfully nice to have a RFr. Be ready to add depth in 2017 as the 5th DT.

 

 

I'm sure the staff sees a bigger depth issue then DT and might be happy to save a couple scholarships for the 17 cycle. Us fans don't see any upperclassmen with experience after this year - so we as fans seem concerned. The staff knows what they have in the young guys and it must be GOOD!!!

 

 

We have 22 seniors plus any other attrition.

 

There's no need to save any spots.

 

The concept of "saving spots" by leaving scholarships empty is not, nor has it ever been, even a concept college football staffs use. No coach is going to willingly mess with their roster distribution to "save spots" - doing it one year messes your roster up for the next four. No.

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...