TGHusker Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 Pretty passionate plea by the house mgrs for witnesses. It has got to be difficult knowing it is all rigged by Moscow Mitch etc. 1 Link to comment
Decoy73 Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 42 minutes ago, Notre Dame Joe said: The Ds had time for over 2 weeks vacation at the end of the inquiry. Then Nancy dilly dallied for what seemed like a month after the vote. That's a lot of time for the Courts to rule on these issues that would clearly be fastracked. But I understand. Nadler said they already had overwhelming proof, so we can ignore last minute attempts to reboot the trial. 2 weeks over the holidays and you think the courts would have cleared up any subpoenas? Oh boy, you clearly have very little knowledge about how the courts work. I’m afraid your continual use of falsehoods and your apparent general knowledge deficit of the subject matter has caused me to lose interest in continuing this little debate. You can have the last word if you wish, but I am finished discussing this with you. 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 hours ago, TGHusker said: OK - let me let off steam for a moment: You know I hope the Dems nominate someone like Amy Klobuchar - someone unexpected and squeaky clean (relative to Trump - I think she had some disgruntled staffers at one time or some story like that) - just to beat trump at his own game. Yes, Amy may be an unrealistic nominee but she seems like the one with the smallest target on her back that Trump could attack or dig dirt up on. I then hope that when he is kicked out of the WH by the voters that the FBI will immediately arrest him on orders of the NYSD for crimes such as these. Ok, back to reality world - I'm willing to vote for Bloomberg, Sanders, anyone if it means voting against Trump. I cannot vote for any GOP Congressional representative this time around. This may be the first time I vote straight Dem - just to send a message. It may not matter in Oklahoma but I can't put my x on the ballot as an endorsement to what my 2 senators, Inhofe and Langford, are doing. Speaking of Amy, and I was above, she is now in 3rd place in Iowa. https://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2020/primary/dem/iadem.html Link to comment
Waldo Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, TGHusker said: Speaking of Amy, and I was above, she is now in 3rd place in Iowa. https://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2020/primary/dem/iadem.html Youth movement!! Link to comment
TGHusker Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 1 minute ago, Waldo said: Youth movement!! Link to comment
Born N Bled Red Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 If anyone has more time and better graphic skills than I, I'd love to see a Meme of the "and you were there, and you, and you," scene of Dororthy in the Wizard of Oz, in which Dorothy is identified as John Bolton, and the rest of the cast are Trump, Mulvany, Cipollone, and Giuliani. 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 Eventually the truth will come out. Some of the parties involved may want to try to get ahead of it - to make them less of a 'villain'. Link to comment
QMany Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 TL;DR: "He did it; but we don't care, because we need to rig elections to win." Republicans/enablers. Link to comment
FrantzHardySwag Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 I'm still trying to understand the argument against allowing witnesses to testify. All I see is, D's in the house should have done the leg work to get those witnesses to testify but they didn't. But as someone not married to either party and not balls deep in reading up on politics every day - I want to know what happened. Maybe I'm an idiot and don't understand how these things work - but if this we're a murder trail, and we had 5 dudes who witnessed the alleged murder - shouldn't we hear what they have to say before we decide if laws were broke and what laws were broke? I wasn't old enough to follow the Clinton Impeachment, so maybe this is just how things work? Help me understand why anyone wouldn't want more information on how this went down? 3 Link to comment
commando Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 we should have 1 witness.....Donald J. Trump 4 1 Link to comment
Huskerzoo Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, FrantzHardySwag said: I'm still trying to understand the argument against allowing witnesses to testify. All I see is, D's in the house should have done the leg work to get those witnesses to testify but they didn't. But as someone not married to either party and not balls deep in reading up on politics every day - I want to know what happened. Maybe I'm an idiot and don't understand how these things work - but if this we're a murder trail, and we had 5 dudes who witnessed the alleged murder - shouldn't we hear what they have to say before we decide if laws were broke and what laws were broke? I wasn't old enough to follow the Clinton Impeachment, so maybe this is just how things work? Help me understand why anyone wouldn't want more information on how this went down? The current argument (and there have been many) is this: He did what the democrats say he did. It's not good, It's just not so bad that removing him from office is worth it. Edited January 31, 2020 by Huskerzoo Double posted 2 Link to comment
teachercd Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 Not sure if it is true but someone said two people "stormed" a Trump golf course and might have fired shots. Hopefully it is just a dumb rumor. Link to comment
Recommended Posts