Mavric Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 https://twitter.com/GarySharp1620/status/844717230856306690 Quote Link to comment
BoNeyard Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 How did Nebraska not get Dana Altman? Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 How did Nebraska not get Dana Altman? Because Oregon is a better job? Quote Link to comment
huskered17 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 How did Nebraska not get Dana Altman? Because Oregon is a better job? I don't know why no one on this board can't give a straight up answer on why, when Altman wanted the Neb job they turned him down. Oregon was not a better job at the time he was hired there. Altman made it a better job. Big mistake by Neb. Great hire for OR. GBR!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 I can't claim to be an expert on the entire climate of college basketball in the mid-2000's, but Creighton was already a better job, and most coaches don't willingly downgrade jobs. Just because they weren't getting quality W-L records doesn't really mean it wasn't a great job to take. Coincidentally coincided with the beginning of Oregon's resurgence in football as well. Quote Link to comment
huskered17 Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 I can't claim to be an expert on the entire climate of college basketball in the mid-2000's, but Creighton was already a better job, and most coaches don't willingly downgrade jobs. Just because they weren't getting quality W-L records doesn't really mean it wasn't a great job to take. Coincidentally coincided with the beginning of Oregon's resurgence in football as well. Still, doesn't answer the Question does it. Altman wanted the job here. Oregon trending upward in football and the w-l record in basketball there, good or bad, wouldn't have made a difference. Altman wanted the Neb job. All I'm asking is why wasn't he hired. Is there something that I'm missing, that was explained back then. GBR!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
desertshox Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 I can't claim to be an expert on the entire climate of college basketball in the mid-2000's, but Creighton was already a better job, and most coaches don't willingly downgrade jobs. Just because they weren't getting quality W-L records doesn't really mean it wasn't a great job to take. Coincidentally coincided with the beginning of Oregon's resurgence in football as well. they passed him up multiple times. first time brought nebraska the great barry collier. believe that was when he said he wanted the nu job. dont think when they hired the peerless doc sadler he was even a consideration. by the time the miles experiment came around he was already at oregon. he also would have been the reason for creighton being the better job in 2007. he also left k-state to take over creighton after the 93-94 season. for whatever reason altman was never the direction they wanted to go with the basketball program. 2 Quote Link to comment
huskered17 Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 I can't claim to be an expert on the entire climate of college basketball in the mid-2000's, but Creighton was already a better job, and most coaches don't willingly downgrade jobs. Just because they weren't getting quality W-L records doesn't really mean it wasn't a great job to take. Coincidentally coincided with the beginning of Oregon's resurgence in football as well. they passed him up multiple times. first time brought nebraska the great barry collier. believe that was when he said he wanted the nu job. dont think when they hired the peerless doc sadler he was even a consideration. by the time the miles experiment came around he was already at oregon. he also would have been the reason for creighton being the better job in 2007. he also left k-state to take over creighton after the 93-94 season. for whatever reason altman was never the direction they wanted to go with the basketball program. TY. That's the best I've seen explained on why he was not hired for the job. It's just frustrating to watch or figure out what direction this program is trying to go. All it seems like the last 10-15 yrs is, it is going in circles. GBR!!! Quote Link to comment
TonyStalloni Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 I can't claim to be an expert on the entire climate of college basketball in the mid-2000's, but Creighton was already a better job, and most coaches don't willingly downgrade jobs. Just because they weren't getting quality W-L records doesn't really mean it wasn't a great job to take. Coincidentally coincided with the beginning of Oregon's resurgence in football as well. Still, doesn't answer the Question does it. Altman wanted the job here. Oregon trending upward in football and the w-l record in basketball there, good or bad, wouldn't have made a difference. Altman wanted the Neb job. All I'm asking is why wasn't he hired. Is there something that I'm missing, that was explained back then. GBR!!! From what I remember the AD wasn't ready to hire Dana when Collier was hired. Not sure why Collier was thought to be a better hire. When TO hired Sadler again it was over Altman and when Altman started looking around Sadler was only in year 2 and we weren't ready to make a change. In hindsight DA could have been a great hire with the local guy does well theme. Maybe TO wanted to be the only "local kid" to become a legend. He didn't make many great hires when he was AD. Quote Link to comment
desertshox Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 Altman only had 7 yrs HC experience when Collier was hired. Collier had 11 yrs at Butler and had just finished his 4th 20 win season in a row. He also had 6 yrs exp as an assistant in the PAC10. Just looking at their resumes up to that point and Collier does make sense to hire given he had more experience as an AC/HC. and with hindsight being what it is, you look at Altman's resume now and are frustrated with how Nebraska failed to hire him not once but twice. Flip side of that is you dont know if he would have been able to duplicate the success he has enjoyed thus far in his career. 3 Quote Link to comment
chainsaw Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I need some confirmation; did he leave K-state or was he let go. I guess for years, i thought he was let go but i'm not sure that's correct? Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I need some confirmation; did he leave K-state or was he let go. I guess for years, i thought he was let go but i'm not sure that's correct? One of the media guys this week termed it "basically run off" but I'm not sure exactly. I took that to mean he wasn't fired but the situation wasn't going well so he looked elsewhere. Quote Link to comment
chainsaw Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I looked up his record at k-state; he never had a winning record in the big-eight but was coach of the year in big eight, one year before he left. had been as assistant 2yrs before getting head job. had left the previous season for 1yr stint at marshall. Quote Link to comment
BoNeyard Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 I guess I always thought that even though Oregon may have been a better coaching job, what local guy wouldn't want to go to their home states big time university. He succeeded at Creighton, you'd think we would be able to succeed at Nebraska. Heck, just transfer the Creighton kids to Lincoln. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.