LaunchCode Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 9 hours ago, HuskerJax said: At least one was on the receiver (right through Morgan's hands bounced to d), one was on the last drive, which was totally a bad throw by him (game decided at that point). I don't really remember the other two to be honest, I went fuzzy and started multitasking to avoid having a stroke I think it was the last INT, not 100% sure, the DE hit Lee's arm as he was in the process of throwing the ball which caused the ball to be way off target and an easy pick. I go back to the first pick, which was not Lee's fault. That gets caught as it should have been and we're not down 14-0 early. We then run the ball more and have Oregon's D guessing. Instead we had to play catch up so they were able to take chances with a big lead, and be more aggressive defensively. Quote Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 27 minutes ago, Mavric said: Here's part of the problem. These are passes you simply can not miss if you're going to be a good QB. First pass play of our second possession. Clean pocket. Clear passing lane. Wide open receiver. And he sails it way over DPE's head and it was behind him to boot. This it totally Lee's inability to complete one of the easiest passes he'll have. 100% inexcusable and the type of play we expect to be made. 1 Quote Link to comment
jdhusker Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 9 hours ago, ColoradoHusk said: The 4 INT's aren't a total indictment on the QB, but they are an indictment on Langsdorf's (and Riley's) offense. In 2015, we were told that the mistakes were due to Armstrong's poor passing and decision making. Now, that Riley and Langsdorf have a QB more of their style, the offense is still making mistakes. I agree 100%. You basically need a NFL QB to run their system how they want it but the problem is how many NFL QBs are out there every year? Even at Oregon State Riley had only 2-3 QBs that we're good enough to run it very well and they still lost at least 4 games those years. At best in Riley's system you will get a 2 year starter because it takes 2-3 before you can even run it effectively. These kids only have 5 years max and 2-3 shouldn't be used to learn a system. Quote Link to comment
KingBlank Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 6 hours ago, MattyIce said: Tommy would've done the exact same thing. Brought us to the brink and thrown a pick. His would've been worse. Check the Miami game........... Or drive down and win like he did last year 1 Quote Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Lee is an average to a little above average QB. He has a nice arm. Accuracy is a little suspect. Locks onto one receiver and does not get rid of the ball that quickly. He is a nice 7-9 win QB. He does not have "it" and I dont think he will lead us to a west title. Hope Im wrong but in two games I just dont see it. 3 Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 6 hours ago, MattyIce said: Tommy would've done the exact same thing. Brought us to the brink and thrown a pick. His would've been worse. Check the Miami game........... Uhh, Matty? Tommy Armstrong: Passing: 17-33, 200 YDS, 3 TDs, 0 INTs, Rushing: 95 YDS, 1 TD Tanner Lee: Passing:19-41, 252 yards, 3 TDs, 4 INTs Rushing: -13 YDS Same exact thing? 2 Quote Link to comment
Huskerzoo Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 12 hours ago, MyBloodIsRed16 said: Yeah the first one went off Morgan's face.... the other 3 are totally on Lee. I would argue the final one isn't 100% on Lee. Got hit as he was throwing the ball. He hadn't even held onto it for a particularly long time. Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 If you pass like Armstrong but can't run at all...well... 1 Quote Link to comment
commando Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 do any of our players do anything positive? or are all of them sad pathetic losers? Quote Link to comment
commando Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 i think we should support them rather than do everything we can to tear them down...but maybe that is just me. 3 Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 2 hours ago, jdhusker said: I agree 100%. You basically need a NFL QB to run their system how they want it but the problem is how many NFL QBs are out there every year? Even at Oregon State Riley had only 2-3 QBs that we're good enough to run it very well and they still lost at least 4 games those years. At best in Riley's system you will get a 2 year starter because it takes 2-3 before you can even run it effectively. These kids only have 5 years max and 2-3 shouldn't be used to learn a system. I don't get why people are in favor of such a complex offense. It just doesn't work with scholarship limits and the limited number of hours the coaches can work with the kids. If an offense requires NFL caliber players to be a good offense, then it's going to struggle in the college game. Good coaches are able to run good offenses that aren't as complex. Maryland was able to put in a true frosh at QB against Texas and they didn't miss a beat. That true frosh QB is going to start the rest of this season. 3 Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 27 minutes ago, commando said: i think we should support them rather than do everything we can to tear them down...but maybe that is just me. Namaste - Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 We should be celebrating this and cheering on his development. Can't wait to see how he progresses in his time here. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, zoogs said: We should be celebrating this and cheering on his development. Can't wait to see how he progresses in his time here. I hope Lee can do well as a Husker, but I don't give 2 sh#ts if he has prototype NFL size or arm strength. He needs to play well as a Husker first. 5 Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 I'm just as behind Tanner as I ever have been. Y'all are nuts 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.