teachercd Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Anyone live in Cali, is it really "that bad", I know Oakland has changed a bit over the last few years but I can't imagine it is any worse than Omaha which is pretty much the same size. 1 Link to comment
commando Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 23 minutes ago, teachercd said: Anyone live in Cali, is it really "that bad", I know Oakland has changed a bit over the last few years but I can't imagine it is any worse than Omaha which is pretty much the same size. my oldest lives there and he likes it. 1 1 1 Link to comment
funhusker Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 8 hours ago, DevoHusker said: That’s funny! When is the last time KH even gave a speech or seen in public? She might be as big a factor as Joe”s age. People just don’t seem to like her… 1 Link to comment
Crusader Husker Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 I do think Dem's will replace her. Only issue is having to confuse JB with a different VP. 2 1 Link to comment
teachercd Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 11 hours ago, funhusker said: That’s funny! When is the last time KH even gave a speech or seen in public? She might be as big a factor as Joe”s age. People just don’t seem to like her… They have done THE WORST job with her. You have a female minority VP of the greatest strongest country in the world and they literally do not to set her up for success. It makes no sense at all. She should be the most visible VP in history, period. 1 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 For the “far share bro” crowd 1 3 1 Link to comment
deedsker Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 21 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: For the “far share bro” crowd So the top earners pay closer to their fair share and we are supposed to be mad? 3 1 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 37 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: For the “far share bro” crowd Link to comment
Moiraine Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 hours ago, Archy1221 said: For the “far share bro” crowd The chart should show the ratio of income % to tax % over time. The top 1% are paying a bigger % of taxes now, but it's not showing what % they earned before. I looked up a single data point, 1980, and the top 1% earned 10% of income then, so the ratio was 19%/10% = 1.9. Now it's 45.8%/26.3% = 1.7. I.E. things have become more favorable for the top 1% over time. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 5 hours ago, deedsker said: So the top earners pay closer to their fair share and we are supposed to be mad? How much of the tax bill is their fair share for top 1%? Top 5% To answer your question, I can’t define what you personally should be mad about. That’s more of a you decision. 1 1 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Another a$$ kicking for the MAGA messaging. Maybe they should have kept Cheney. Who knew failing to pass border and national security legislation would be a loser at the polls? The Democrats over performed again by 7 points. What Nate Silver doing..lol Tom Suozzi Dem. 91,338 +53.9% Mazi Pilip Rep. 78,229 +46.1% 1 1 Link to comment
teachercd Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Scarlet said: Another a$$ kicking for the MAGA messaging. Maybe they should have kept Cheney. Who knew failing to pass border and national security legislation would be a loser at the polls? The Democrats over performed again by 7 points. What Nate Silver doing..lol Tom Suozzi Dem. 91,338 +53.9% Mazi Pilip Rep. 78,229 +46.1% Yep... The "polls" of this upcoming election are so off. 1 1 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts