mrandyk Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 On 10/24/2018 at 9:01 PM, Ric Flair said: I don’t think anyone has any idea who did it or what their motive(s) were at this point. But everyone should feel free to jump to conclusions and believe whatever is politically beneficial, regardless of the lack of evidence, They call that Christine Blasey Ford Syndrome. What do you have to say now that those easily drawn conclusions have been verified? Link to comment
NM11046 Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 I'm shocked there haven't been any Florida State jokes here yet ... 1 Link to comment
HuskerNBigD Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 27 minutes ago, NM11046 said: I'm shocked there haven't been any Florida State jokes here yet ... He's also a N. Carolina and Clemson fan. Back right window Carolina Soccer Clemson Tigers This guy is off his rocker. Link to comment
ZRod Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 35 minutes ago, GSG said: Holy s#!t... 1 hour ago, NM11046 said: I'm shocked there haven't been any Florida State jokes here yet ... You mean the Florida State Seminal Vesicles? 1 Link to comment
Landlord Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 41 minutes ago, GSG said: I'd be furious and traumatized if I was her but I'm not sure what exactly she's trying to prove or get at. The guy obviously very purposefully said everything super vague and indirectly so as to not violate Twitter's rules, and Twitter found that he didn't violate any. It's not like he sent a bomb to her. Is she trying to prove some kind of point? Link to comment
commando Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 7 minutes ago, Landlord said: I'd be furious and traumatized if I was her but I'm not sure what exactly she's trying to prove or get at. The guy obviously very purposefully said everything super vague and indirectly so as to not violate Twitter's rules, and Twitter found that he didn't violate any. It's not like he sent a bomb to her. Is she trying to prove some kind of point? aside from threatening to kill her and dispose of her somewhere in the swamp? air boat rides are silent only to the dead. Link to comment
funhusker Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 8 minutes ago, Landlord said: I'd be furious and traumatized if I was her but I'm not sure what exactly she's trying to prove or get at. The guy obviously very purposefully said everything super vague and indirectly so as to not violate Twitter's rules, and Twitter found that he didn't violate any. It's not like he sent a bomb to her. Is she trying to prove some kind of point? I think her point was pretty clear. Twitter rules are pointless. Link to comment
Landlord Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 1 minute ago, commando said: aside from threatening to kill her and dispose of her somewhere in the swamp? air boat rides are silent only to the dead. He didn't actually threaten her, though. Not explicitly or directly or clearly. The 'threat' only exists from a certain intrepretation of vague and loose sentences. It's certainly not a threat in any way that would ever be chargeable as a crime or hold up in a court room, and probably also not by any companies definitions of threat in their user agreements. Companies have to have policies like this that are loose to protect them from litigation at the hands of people like this guy who would sue for wrongful termination/suspension of his account or whatever. IDK I'm sure @QMany or others could chime in with more informed intelligence haha. Link to comment
knapplc Posted October 26, 2018 Author Share Posted October 26, 2018 Wait, the MAGAbomber attended Trump's MAGA conferences and was a huge Trump supporter? 1 Link to comment
commando Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 5 minutes ago, Landlord said: He didn't actually threaten her, though. Not explicitly or directly or clearly. The 'threat' only exists from a certain intrepretation of vague and loose sentences. It's certainly not a threat in any way that would ever be chargeable as a crime or hold up in a court room, and probably also not by any companies definitions of threat in their user agreements. Companies have to have policies like this that are loose to protect them from litigation at the hands of people like this guy who would sue for wrongful termination/suspension of his account or whatever. IDK I'm sure @QMany or others could chime in with more informed intelligence haha. i don't see how to read that and not think it was a threat. Link to comment
Landlord Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 6 minutes ago, commando said: i don't see how to read that and not think it was a threat. Because it doesn't explicitly say that he is going to do anything to her. I agree with you, btw, I'm just arguing from the perspective of the technicalities and the language that likely made it not in violation of Twitters user agreement. Link to comment
commando Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 i think this is about right 3 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 52 minutes ago, commando said: i think this is about right Very well stated. He has emboldened crazies who otherwise wouldn’t have come out from the holes they were hiding on. He made it less shameful, at least to these people, to be racist and sexist and hateful. 3 Link to comment
HuskerNBigD Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 1 hour ago, ZRod said: Holy s#!t... You mean the Florida State Seminal Vesicles? Letterkenny, nice! Link to comment
Recommended Posts