Jump to content


Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/17/2024 in all areas

  1. Trev just needs to shut his dirty whore mouth. Does he actually think his comments are cute?
    4 points
  2. Troll better.
    4 points
  3. Archy so narrowly defined the question to be framed as Republicans actively and consciously supporting the success of Russia ahead of the success of the United States. Shame on y'all for taking the bait on that, but I digress. It's not as if the GOP at large is pro Russian interests of their own volition. It's moreso that they're too stupid to realize the bedfellows they are happy to welcome in and the dangers and implications of the wolf at the door who looks like grandma who pinky promises she will keep lil Red from the gay trans athlete coastal elites.
    4 points
  4. Back when I was in college in Omaha I'm pretty sure at the Dodge street location they just took the shovel-sized scoop they used for fries and dumped em directly into your bag. It was by far the most fries I've gotten at any burger place ever. Didn't even come close to finishing em.
    3 points
  5. We went to Subway a couple days ago because we had a gift card. $39 for a foot long and 2 6". Ya that's weird. Tipping is for waiters who make less than minimum wage. And sushi chefs.
    3 points
  6. In a nutshell, Archy. Early in his Presidency, Donald Trump stood next to Vladimir Putin and told the world he trusted Putin over the unanimous conclusion of his 17 U.S. intelligence agencies. Republicans anxious to support Trump quickly began softening longstanding rhetoric around Putin and Russia. Fox News was already on board, its pundits having aired segments showing the shirtless Putin and wishing aloud Obama was this manly and commanding. Trump gets blustery about NATO not paying its bill, not quite understanding how the agreement works. Putin joins a list of other world leaders, including Viktor Orban, admired for their autocratic rule rather than democratic principals. Next thing you know, Fox pundits, farther right media, and elected Republicans are wondering if Russia is the real victim in the Ukraine war. Yada yada yada...Tucker Carlson goes to Moscow, declares it nicer than any American city, expresses his disgust for the United States, and gives Putin the hand-picked platform he wanted. Tucker is currently on a short list for either Vice-President or Secretary of State in a second Trump term. Bada-bing, bada boom. It's not just two douchebags in t-shirts.
    3 points
  7. Unable to follow today. Great job Huskers. Swept a team that many expected to make post season. Bats alive
    2 points
  8. 2 points
  9. Have whatever opinion you want. Mine is f#&% Trev. He took a lateral move for lateral money, away from his alma mater because things weren’t absolutely perfect with the leadership. Boo frikken hoo.
    2 points
  10. 2 points
  11. She’s a complete moron, we all agree. But why post fake videos passing them off as real?
    2 points
  12. You're a weird guy. Sometimes I respond as if you want to be taken seriously, cause you spend a lot of time in P&R. Then I remember how much you like to hide behind your whimsy.
    2 points
  13. After all we've heard come out of his mouth the past so many years ("stand back and stand by", "you need to fight like hell or we won't have a country", "poisoning the blood of our country", etc) whether he was speaking literally or about the auto industry metaphorically the fact of the matter is that his intentions are to rile up his base to the point of violence. I can't believe any reasonable, not gullible person would give him the benefit of the doubt at this time. If one does want to give him that benefit, then they'd have to say he's an idiot for using that terminology knowing what the reaction would be. He's not the brightest bulb but he does know demagoguery so I'd say he knew exactly what he was doing.
    2 points
  14. They say every foul is worth 12 points. Seriously. Well somebody said that once. Okay, it was me, I just said it.
    2 points
  15. So your natural instinct to get even with the evil leftist hypocrites is to rush to the defense of the fascist a$$h@!e. Got it.
    2 points
  16. I think you can be pro-innocent civilians. Unfortunately some of those civilians have leadership who are literal terrorists.
    2 points
  17. Ooops! https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/23/republicans-view-putin-more-favorably-than-they-do-leading-democrats/
    2 points
  18. If you're talking about the Dave Rimington that played for Nebraska and has a trophy named after him, then the correct spelling is "Rimington." I have no idea who the other "Remmington" is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Rimington
    2 points
  19. I’m on board as long as by “house “ you include the governor’s mansion.
    2 points
  20. I'm okay with anything really as long as there are no guaranteed byes for certain conferences. Which would be the most ridiculous thing ever. Even if it benefited Nebraska.
    2 points
  21. The committee always seems to have a sense of humor with 1 or 2 1st round games each year, so I am going to call it now: 7 Nebraska vs 10 Texas A&M
    2 points
  22. He's set for trial that they conveniently delayed until the season is over. There's not nothing there if there's a trial. It's ok to admit your wrong and that you condone it. Thanks for agreeing!
    1 point
  23. No, that's not what he said. He said "contact happens on one [end] and they call it a foul. Go the other way and they don't call a foul." That doesn't make it inconsistent. That means that the contact on one end was a foul and while the other contact wasn't. Just because there is contact doesn't mean there is a foul. Not all contact is equal.
    1 point
  24. Agree that a bit of what you said is relevant to the point. Others might think the rest doesn’t pertain to the discussion at hand or is kinda false. Trump was falsely accused by people Democrats and Never Trumpers working within those 17 IC agencies of conspiring with Russia to win 2016 election. Which has been proven to be absurdly false which we all know now and agree to. I do agree that’s it’s strange to politically flex on another party by saying some foreign leader is so much tougher than what we have. We know why they do it, (for the partisan media likes and social media hits and fanfare) but it’s ridiculous none the less. Whether or not Trump knows how NATO works, it was common knowledge many countries were getting an almost free security ride paid for by the good ol USA. As you know, NATO funding stepped up after Trumps pressure campaign. I don’t know what Fox pundits say unless Buster posts it here, I don’t watch cable news of any kind anymore. I would have to see a relevant political pundit say Russia is the victim before acknowledging your statement as true. Tucker is a buffoon for his statements about Moscow and he is getting roundly mocked for them. As he should. And yes, two dolts in a HAHA shirt does not equate to GOP lawmakers actively trying to set policy for Russia instead of our interests which was the original thesis by someone
    1 point
  25. I'm guessing that is fake. Although, it's definitely believable.
    1 point
  26. No ones asking you cry crocodile tears, or elephant tears, or human tears. No ones asking you to defend Trump. All @DevoHusker pointed out was why defend the misinformation and the hypocrisy of many on the Left or certain people on the board not caring about sharing misinformation as long as it’s pointed at Trump or Republicans. There are many things to drag Trump over one could share in posts that are quite true. Why support the posts that are disinformation?
    1 point
  27. ESPN has Nebraska as an 8 seed in the South Region playing New Mexico in Memphis. CBS has them as a 9 seed playing Colorado State in the East Region in Brooklyn. Computer rankings are 29 at Ken Pom, 23 at Bart Torvik, 33 in the NET, 32 at Evan Miya, 37 in BPI & 22 in SOR. Bart Torvik projects them as an 8 seed with an 90.2% chance to make the field.
    1 point
  28. It wasn’t me who defined it if you were paying attention. “It’s also a problem when one party actively is working for Russia so that they help them get elected. And, their actions go against our best interests.”
    1 point
  29. Anybody else care to explain to me how that a$$h@!e is the victim here? I'd really love it explained in greater detail. I really didn't think the "Donald J. Trump, perpetual victim" movement needed more steam, but it chugs along.
    1 point
  30. I think the imbalance in how the game was called on both ends (not saying we didn't foul, but 9-3 foul differential with 12 minutes to go) affected how the defense played as they couldn't breath on Shannon driving without a foul being called. Then when one of our guys would drive and get similar contact, nothing. But, we also have to make shots and get the ball in the basket.
    1 point
  31. You argue the silliest points and just willingly sidestep anything that isn't explicitly spelled out for you. I get it, it makes your arguments easier. Here's the problem: whether you care to acknowledge it or not, a growing sentiment within the base of your party is that Russia isn't that bad. They're just taking back what's theirs. The other side are the aggressors. They're trying to uphold conservative christian values. Or any other number of ridiculous arguments I've heard that they're not really a threat and other entities are much more clear and present dangers to us as a nation. Peak ridiculousness i that notion that Russia is constrained under Trump/Republicans generally and only aggressive under Democrats because they're more afraid of the tougher Republicans. Hell, if I go up a few posts you're using a version of this argument. GOP electeds realize these dynamics and exploit them for their own benefit because their voters are stupid enough to believe this crap. They're not advancing Russian interests because they care about Russia. They just know their voters are utter rubes and they're happy to make them useful idiots if it keeps them in their cushy Washington gigs. It's bad for the world and it's damaging our democracy.
    1 point
  32. Advocating for genocide is quite the stance, especially with your previous posts ridiculing the "pro-pally" crowd for suggesting that the Palestinians are being wiped out in a genocide.
    1 point
  33. Because you were attempting to use the facts to belittle an opponent rather than taking a moment to actually look into the team as a whole. Your original post was made in an attempt to "snub" Nebraska's victory.
    1 point
  34. Assuming Sears is done as his count is near 90. Only 3 hits, 5k, most importantly 0 runs on a day with wind blowing out. Husker bats stay hot as Swanson blast 3 run shot
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-05:00

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...