Leaderboard

Stone launches one to tie the game at four! We missed an opportunity as a very aggressive. Send by Harville cost the huskers a run. Brand new game,

• Donald Trump was exonerated and will not be making Putin-friendly decisions in office. • Donald Trump isn't going to fight the results of the 2020 election • And if he does, Donald Trump isn't going to do something crazy, like instigate a violent coup. • And if he does instigate a violent coup, the Republicans will quickly distance themselves from him. The "election hoax" rhetoric will fade to oblivion and the GOP will return to issues-based campaigning. • As they distance themselves from Trump, the GOP will embrace saner alternatives, like Ron DeSantis. • Trump's Supreme Court appointees are reasonable folks who made it clear they're fine with the Roe v Wade precedent. Why are you freaking out? • The Marjorie Taylor Greene wing will not exert any significant influence on the party itself. • What paranoid world do you live in where Donald Trump inserts his daughter-in-law as the RNC chairwoman, and funnels the money to himself? • Our electoral college system held, and only a worrywort would think red state legislatures might take a lesson from 2020 and reengineer the rules to make it easier to overrule the popular vote. • And if they do, it probably won't come into play. Because Biden is going to win so handily over Joe Biden, even MAGA will accept defeat and work together to advance this great country of ours. • We remain a nation of laws. It's not like the Supreme Court is going to look America in the eye and say a President is immune from the laws we citizens must follow. That's a dictatorship, man. • And when the guy I voted for twice promises a scorched earth, day-one dictator second term, he's just kidding to get you libs riled up. What has he ever done to make you think he'll go off the rails and take as many people as possible with him?

Well it would certainly be a weird decision for him to go to the NFL a full year before he's allowed to.

IDK, the checks and balances have been pretty darned insufficient here the last few years. If they were working properly, DJT could not and would not be a viable presidential candidate. Obviously there are some flaws or something is broken.

I've been told I should relax and trust our system of checks and balances, but it feels like the SC just turned up the heat on our Boil the Frog scenario.

Nebraska was the clear leader two weeks ago. After the Alabama OV, "experts" went with the tide because they couldn't see Dawson picking us over them. Raiola (His visit host) and HCMR are recruiting him personally. His dad is a coach for the Kansas City Chiefs and his mom has hit it off with Dylan's mom. Nebraska also has a clear vision for him on D compared to other schools (Jack position). Proximity matters here too. All in all, I think Nebraska is going to get him.

After Froelich shut them down in the top half the husker strand two in the bottom half

Froelich into pitch. new game both starting pitchers are no decision

Sears gets through 5 with some good defense from Silva. On a positive, even during his roughest outing of the season, Sears has made it five eating up innings. negative, is that we only have two hits

Sears gets through top of three with no runs husker dugout not happy with a handful of pitches that inning. A lot of good pitches didn’t go our way

Largely mitigated by the fact that so much of what the advice-giver swore would never happen, has happened.

Always Be Crootin'

https://twitter.com/JUCOadvocate/status/1783896737167614251/photo/1 Would be nice to get back in on this one.

would be funny if it wasn't true

Yeah, I've seen that. The conservative justices want to delay it as long as possible so it further delays some of his trials so they aren't decided before the election. Yes, this should be the most important decision they are deciding and it should be done immediately. Watching the SCOTUS recently drills home the opinion I've had for a long time. The SC is best when it's a 5-4 split. One side having a large majority on the SC is a really bad thing.

Very well said. This is a corrupt Supreme Court. They barely touched on the only question they should have been considering. Here's the whole thread: As with the three-hour argument in Trump v. Anderson, a disconcertingly precious little of the two-hour argument today was even devoted to the specific and only question presented for decision. The Court and the parties discussed everything but the specific question presented. That question is simply whether a former President of the United States may be prosecuted for attempting to remain in power notwithstanding the election of his successor by the American People. thereby also depriving his lawfully elected successor of the powers of the presidency to which that successor became entitled upon his rightful election by the American People -- and preventing the peaceful transfer of power for the first time in American history. It is not even arguably a core power or function of the President of the United States to ensure the fairness, accuracy, and integrity of a presidential election. Let alone is it a core power or function of the President of the United States to ensure the proper certification of the next president by the Congress of the United States. Neither of these is a power or function of the president at all. In fact, the Framers of the Constitution well understood the enormous potential for self-interested conflict were the President to have a role in these fundamental constitutional functions. Consequently, they purposely and pointedly withheld from the President any role in these fundamental constitutional functions. To whatever extent the Framers implicitly provided in the Executive any role whatsoever in these fundamental constitutional functions, it was a limited role for the Executive Branch, through the Department of Justice, to inquire into allegations of fraud in presidential elections and ensure that the election was free, fair, and accurate. The former president’s Department of Justice did just that and found that there was no fraud sufficient to draw into question the results of the 2020 presidential election. The former president of course has refused to this day to accept that finding by not only his own Department of Justice, but also countless others of his closest advisors. Whether undertaken in his or her “official,” “candidate,” or “personal” capacity, a President of the United States has never been and can never be immune from prosecution (after leaving office), for having attempted to remain in power notwithstanding the election of that President’s successor by the American People. Consequently, there is no reason whatsoever for the Supreme Court to remand to the lower courts for a determination of which of the alleged criminal acts might have been personal and which might have been official. Neither is a clear statement from Congress that a president is subject to prosecution under the statutes with which the former president has been charged necessary in this particular case. As applied to the former president for the criminal conduct with which he has been charged, there can be no question but that Congress intended a President of the United States to come within the ambit of the statutory offenses with which he has been charged. For the same reason, it would be ludicrous to contend that the former president was not on sufficient notice that if he committed the criminal acts charged, he would be subject to criminal prosecution by the United States of America. To hold otherwise would make a mockery out of the “plain statement” rule.

Huskers missed great opportunity at the plate. Manage to get one run back and bases loaded With only one out and could not get another, run home

More like it from Sears in the second. Hawkeyes go quietly.

Everybody staying safe?

While true, we've been fed sunshine for years and it basically never turns out the way they relay. I'm done listening to it. My conclusions on HH are what I witnessed in 23. One offseason can't turn him into a QB, but God bless him for giving it his all. I appreciate the guy, and don't mean to seem like I'm ragging on him because I am not. This just isn't his position. He is a great athlete that could help this team elsewhere.

Absolutely bonkers

Some one ban this guy lol. I think HH and DK see the bigger picture. DR was the starter all along. If he has a Good fresh year and a Great Soph year he is gone. HH at the 2 and DK redshirting is what we need. Heres to hoping we bring in some more Ballers at Qb as well though.

MSFT showed good AI growth last night and they aren’t even the leaders in the space. Bringing up the AI players.

https://twitter.com/JayviarSuggs7/status/1783846203253227637 His tweet is showing as explicit content or something but it's just a pic of Memorial Stadium lol https://247sports.com/college/louisville/article/jayviar-suggs-louisville-iowa-wisconsin-arkansas-football-recruiting-231036245/ Says NU, Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana, Arkansas, TCU, and KSUx all offered in the last 24 hours. He also just tweeted an offer from Mich St.

That’s pretty good advice!

How's everyone feeling about their team's picks last night? Cowboys added some value by trading back and got the guy they seemed to want all along. I do worry that he played RT almost exclusively. Although he didn't allow a sack last year. Bo Nix time in Denver... Seemed a little high but sounds like that's they Payton wanted @Mavric 49ers took a WR? Have to get @Guy Chamberlin's take on that

I love that you can ask Ai to create a commercial for a non-existent 1950s theme park for you, and marvel at the nightmare it comes up with.

They've been trying to placate runthedamnballguy in the press conferences by saying they're just not focused on the running game because they're confident in it from last year, but anyone even remotely paying attention should see right through that. They know they have a kid with a rocket laser arm and a room of potentially very explosive wide receivers and most of those aforementioned pieces are simply young and inexperienced. What we see a lot in teams fitting Nebraska's profile of having to start a young QB after coming off a season where they ran the ball pretty effectively and had a pretty good defense is to protect the young QB and rely on those other elements. Are we seeing that in practice? No, not even close. Two of these guys should be worried who they're taking to the senior prom right now and instead are watching White play dial-a-blitz on them. They're trying to cram as much experience into these young guys as they can. My opinion, and that's all it is worth, is there is a belief in that building that if this offense can even remotely approach its potential that this can be an extremely good team this year. They're not treating this like they just need to win a couple more games and go bowling.

Yes, agree on the bold. Of course I use to think the same about Congress - Dem / GOP split. But until the GOP gets rid of its cultish/MAGA ways, I don't want them controlling either the house or the senate.

Yeah, I've seen that. The conservative justices want to delay it as long as possible so it further delays some of his trials so they aren't decided before the election. How do you know this?

He's not leaning Nebraska at all.

sounds like passthedamnballguy is going to be happy

They'll take Edwards if they can land him, not sure I'd say he's leaning Nebraska's way, though.

Worth watching to the very end.

And pardoned by the person with absolute immunity.

65K a year a year and they don't even get the choice to walk. That sucks, maybe not even so much for the student but more for their family.

As in?

Not from what I've read.