Mavric Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 Fuel up the jet. We gotta go visit... 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 Kyle McCord highlights--- Look at the patience, arm strength, and touch. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 I bet if we got Kyle McCord we'd have a thousand yard rusher due to his ability to stretch the field. Heck, we could even get runs off those draw plays and score way more than 3 points in three quarters. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 2 hours ago, Husker in WI said: Regarding the toughness of playing QB in the Big Ten - in admittedly limited action and with incredible skill talent, Hudson Card was a 65% passer with an 11/2 TD/INT ratio and 7.9 YPA at Texas. At Purdue, with decent skill talent, that was 59%, 15/8, and 6.5. The AAC is another step down but Mordecai and Bryant also saw huge decreases in their stats. There are a lot of bad QBs in this conference, but there are also a lot of average ones made to look bad. To me, that’s a selling point. Come here, if you are good, you have proven you can go against good defenses. Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 (edited) I don't think I saw it mentioned but Cam Ward is graduating Dec 9th. They're not expecting him take any official visits until after that. From what I read from Wazzu fans, Ward would play hero ball at times - try to extend a play too much and end up taking a huge untimely sack or fumble it. Honestly though, I would be happy with any of the guys we've visited because they're all proven at the P5 level and would be an upgrade over what we have (left.) Edited December 7, 2023 by GSG 2 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 I continue to be interested in the exodus from OSU. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 6 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: I continue to be interested in the exodus from OSU. Backup RB wants to be the bell cow for his 5th year. I wish it meant something and OSU was crumbling, but I'm telling you they are perfectly content with every one of their portal entries so far moving on. They would've liked McCord and Fleming as depth, but that's it. 3 Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 20 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: I continue to be interested in the exodus from OSU. Higher quality table scraps tend to fall off the Buckeye table. I don’t think they’re too concerned. Lots more Michelin starred food in the kitchen. 2 Quote Link to comment
chamrocck Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 33 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: I continue to be interested in the exodus from OSU. I would not mind adding a big thumper power back. This OSU kid or the kid from Arkansas. Any others? Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 7 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: With so few spots they are gonna be very particular. Like this one Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 3 hours ago, Hayseed said: I bet if we got Kyle McCord we'd have a thousand yard rusher due to his ability to stretch the field. Heck, we could even get runs off those draw plays and score way more than 3 points in three quarters. You have me right there! 1 Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 Honest question/observation. I wonder what type of offense we are planning to use next year. (Don't want another discussion of scheme/identity). Basically a dual threat QB or more "traditional" passing QB. I think by default and circumstances we ran the QB A LOT. Some by design and necessity. BUT, it looks like we are interviewing QB's with a diverse skill sets. Some appear to be true "traditional" passing QB's. Other more dual threat. I am ASSuming that looking at more traditional QB's we are possibly going away from the "running qb", but then Howard is being looked at. More dual threat guy. Do we simply run a style based upon the QB? Can our current O do just as well in one vs the other. My .02 is that Satt has a more pro style traditional bent, so I am guessing we might be leaning that way to get an O he "wants" or is more comfortable with. Just seems we are looking for QB's not like our current 3. Quote Link to comment
The Murphinator Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 So where is the plane going tomorrow Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.