DefenderAO Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 48 minutes ago, Caveman said: We are vulnerable to any team with a competent passing game. I do not like our changes against Maryland, in fact I have a suspicion it will be ugly. Not sure what to think about Wisconsin overall, but the Iowa game may be our best/only chance to become bowl eligible. We held Purdue in check. I’m not saying you’re wrong; we definitely need to generate turnovers to help out our terrible offense. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 12 hours ago, CheeseHusker said: I kind of got the feeling Nebraska just expected to turn up today and win. At no point did they appear to match MSU's intensity, effort, or desire. It seemed like it was penciled in as an easy win. This was the most disappointing part of the game for me, and where a lot of our problems stemmed from. We saw this SO MUCH the past 20 years. Rhule is doing a good job purging this mentality from the team, but it's not gone yet. It was clear from the first two opening drives that Michigan State brought a greater will to fight than we did. We're pretty evenly matched teams. They out-efforted us. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment
gobiggergoredder Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 1 hour ago, Caveman said: We are vulnerable to any team with a competent passing game. I do not like our changes against Maryland, in fact I have a suspicion it will be ugly. Not sure what to think about Wisconsin overall, but the Iowa game may be our best/only chance to become bowl eligible. We had almost no pass rush against MSU. Hardly heard the from 9 or 0. The sack machine and Lenhardt got in there once each, but that’s all I remember. Quote Link to comment
Vizsla1 Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 We turned the clocks back last tonight. One extra hour of Michigan State/Husker football to enjoy. Quote Link to comment
LennynSquiggy Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 21 hours ago, Red Five said: We all wanted to think this is a new team. But Nebraska is still the same Nebraska we’ve seen for 10 years It is a new team with progress being made and it's out there for anyone that cares to see it. The team is still a work in progress and that's ok. 3 1 2 Quote Link to comment
MyBloodIsRed16 Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 "The Sack man" can get after the QB. He uses his hands well and dips his shoulder under would be blocks very well. Quote Link to comment
desertshox Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 2 hours ago, Husker03 said: We only have 1 game left where we can use Sims. Look for him in that Iowa game. No doubt in my mind Rhule and him have an eligiblity saving agreement in the works now. Which is cute because it allows Sims to make his 1.5 amigos bucks without ever having to sacrifice anything! Why is there only one game left to use Sims? Might as well use him in all three if you're going to use him in 1. He's already taken snaps in 4 games. 3 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 2 hours ago, gossamorharpy said: the problem with the routes you outlined is we don’t have a qb to execute those routes. HH release point coupled with the velocity he throws with is a main reason why he’s sailing a lot of his out throws and quick hits over the middle. my guess is the coaching staff has zero confidence in him to make those plays without a high risk of turnover. Something also tells me that HH’s passing IQ is terribly low, I don’t know how else to explain why he’s still missing receivers wide open by design. You need a qb who can quickly go through designed progressions- something HH has shown incapable of for 2 months now. Except that we did run them and did complete them, as I noted. Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 3 hours ago, Mavric said: It's also pretty mind-boggling that our Special Teams coach specifically said this week he didn't like where we were with punt returns. And our plan to fix it was apparently to fair catch everything. I know Rhule said they were trying for blocks. But after you don't really get all that close on the first few - and run into the kicker once - perhaps a different strategy was in order. Especially with how returnable many of those kicks were. I didn't understand it either. MSU flipped the field on one punt and we struggled to recover from it the rest of the game. It probably cost us a shot at a field goal and maybe being tied up after HH's long run. There were a couple punts where if we had just blocked 2 guys we would have had great starting field position. Just stupid... Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 2 hours ago, Wistrom Disciple said: MSU blitzed at least three different times in the first half alone, so I'm not sure the PFF stats are quite right. The line played well enough for us to win yesterday. Wasn't pretty, but they were not the reason for the loss. Several of those hurries seemed to be HH being unaware of where the pocket in front of him was and didn't trust his eyes & feet while being in there. The 4:26 mark is a perfect example where the line creates a decent pocket, but by the time HH completes his dropback, he's already thinking scramble and he runs right into a sack. I rewatched the first quarter though the end of the touchdown drive. They have not blitzed on a single pass play so far. They did blitz on a couple of plays that turned out to be running plays, so perhaps that's the difference. I'll continue checking after lunch. I don't see a play at the 4:26 mark of that video. But there were definitely a couple of times where he panicked early. Quote Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 2 hours ago, Mavric said: I rewatched the first quarter though the end of the touchdown drive. They have not blitzed on a single pass play so far. They did blitz on a couple of plays that turned out to be running plays, so perhaps that's the difference. I'll continue checking after lunch. I don't see a play at the 4:26 mark of that video. But there were definitely a couple of times where he panicked early. They blitzed on the pass play in the first quarter at the 5:15 mark 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 2 hours ago, Mavric said: I rewatched the first quarter though the end of the touchdown drive. They have not blitzed on a single pass play so far. They did blitz on a couple of plays that turned out to be running plays, so perhaps that's the difference. I'll continue checking after lunch. I don't see a play at the 4:26 mark of that video. But there were definitely a couple of times where he panicked early. They blitzed in the second quarter at the 2:50 mark with the corner 2 hours ago, Mavric said: I rewatched the first quarter though the end of the touchdown drive. They have not blitzed on a single pass play so far. They did blitz on a couple of plays that turned out to be running plays, so perhaps that's the difference. I'll continue checking after lunch. I don't see a play at the 4:26 mark of that video. But there were definitely a couple of times where he panicked early. They blitzed at the 2:10 mark of the second quarter 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 19 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: They blitzed on the pass play in the first quarter at the 5:15 mark Eh ... there's a bit of semantics to that one. The MLB shoots but he's following the back who is flaring out to the right side. He only redirects back towards the QB once he sees the RB isn't going to get the ball. So it ends up being kind of a delayed blitz but it really didn't end up having much of anything to do with the pressure. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 5 hours ago, gossamorharpy said: the problem with the routes you outlined is we don’t have a qb to execute those routes. HH release point coupled with the velocity he throws with is a main reason why he’s sailing a lot of his out throws and quick hits over the middle. my guess is the coaching staff has zero confidence in him to make those plays without a high risk of turnover. Something also tells me that HH’s passing IQ is terribly low, I don’t know how else to explain why he’s still missing receivers wide open by design. You need a qb who can quickly go through designed progressions- something HH has shown incapable of for 2 months now. There were at least four times we ran slants or digs in the 12-15 yard range and those were some of our best plays of the game. Quote Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted November 5, 2023 Share Posted November 5, 2023 19 minutes ago, Mavric said: Eh ... there's a bit of semantics to that one. The MLB shoots but he's following the back who is flaring out to the right side. He only redirects back towards the QB once he sees the RB isn't going to get the ball. So it ends up being kind of a delayed blitz but it really didn't end up having much of anything to do with the pressure. Umm no. He’s coming from the get go and so does the safety. 2 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.