Moiraine Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Nebfanatic said: They are less than a year apart aren't they? Yes. 1 Quote Link to comment
FrantzHardySwag Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, CapoValley said: They weren’t the same age. She was a minor and he wasn’t. So maybe throw in some burpees too. So should be aggressively pursuing every 18 y/o with a 17 y/o GF then. Man if we think prisons are crowded now. 4 1 Quote Link to comment
30-50 Feral Hogs Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, FrantzHardySwag said: So should be aggressively pursuing every 18 y/o with a 17 y/o GF then. Man if we think prisons are crowded now. They should probably aggressively pursue every 18 year old that distributes sex videos of minors, for sure. Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 20 minutes ago, Undone said: I think I said this really early on when this thread first started - he could have gotten his point across to her in exactly the same way by just saying, "Hey, remember that time you _______?" And it's interesting because when you think about it that way, it really flies in the face of all of the posters saying that what he did was so incredibly heinous. It would have had roughly the same effect as actually sending the video. Not exactly the same, but roughly. I think what @Moiraine and others have been saying sounds correct - that he wasn't under the impression she had been raped. It seems like the context is that getting contacted by her opened up some stuff for him that he didn't want to drag out again; the emotions of being dumped by an ex, etc., etc. I get what you're saying, but I disagree strongly that sending words versus sending a sex video are even roughly the same effect. 1 Quote Link to comment
CapoValley Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 Why is everyone who wants Mo to play, no questions asked constantly using imprisonment as an excuse when I and other are simply saying he shouldn’t play until it’s resolved and aren’t bringing up jail once? Quote Link to comment
Undone Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, RedDenver said: I get what you're saying, but I disagree strongly that sending words versus sending a sex video are even roughly the same effect. Totally. According to the letter of the law, they're worlds apart. I should maybe have made it clearer that I was referring to his original intentions and the context of those intentions as it pertains to a lot of people that are pretty drastically committing character assassination against him. Quote Link to comment
30-50 Feral Hogs Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Undone said: Totally. According to the letter of the law, they're worlds apart. I should maybe have made it clearer that I was referring to his original intentions and the context of those intentions as it pertains to a lot of people that are pretty drastically committing character assassination against him. Making Washington into a victim is a turn I didn't see coming. Quote Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, CapoValley said: Why is everyone who wants Mo to play, no questions asked constantly using imprisonment as an excuse when I and other are simply saying he shouldn’t play until it’s resolved and aren’t bringing up jail once? And if the case ends up getting dismissed, he'd have to sit out the whole year for.... What reason? Quote Link to comment
Huskers93-97 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, 30-50 Feral Hogs said: They should probably aggressively pursue every 18 year old that distributes sex videos of minors, for sure. 2 1 Quote Link to comment
brophog Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 In light of this week’s activities, this thread is pretty pointless until after the season. There is almost no way now the courts move fast enough now to come to any conclusions until then. Quote Link to comment
CapoValley Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, ActualCornHusker said: And if the case ends up getting dismissed, he'd have to sit out the whole year for.... What reason? I doubt very seriously there would have been so many delays asked for by his attorneys if sitting the whole season was on the table. As for the case case getting dismissed, They have all his phone, internet and apple records, and the parents of the girl saved all the communications, I’m not a lawyer but that doesn’t sound like a potential dismissal. Quote Link to comment
ActualCornHusker Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 Honest question: Should a girl who has a video of herself performing sexual acts as a minor be charged with possession of child porn? 2 Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 8 minutes ago, CapoValley said: Why is everyone who wants Mo to play, no questions asked constantly using imprisonment as an excuse when I and other are simply saying he shouldn’t play until it’s resolved and aren’t bringing up jail once? My thought was Mo should be suspended for the first game this year to let him know that what he has done is wrong, and he deserves some type of punishment while the case is on-going. The University decided on a 1/2 game suspension, so me and the University have similar opinions. While I am not excusing what Mo did, I think the felony charge is only that strong due to some oddly-worded California laws, along with timing of when Mo became an "adult". 1 Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, CapoValley said: I doubt very seriously there would have been so many delays asked for by his attorneys if sitting the whole season was on the table. As for the case case getting dismissed, They have all his phone, internet and apple records, and the parents of the girl saved all the communications, I’m not a lawyer but that doesn’t sound like a potential dismissal. The revenge porn misdemeanor charge could still be valid, but the child porn felony charge could easily be dismissed. Quote Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 15 minutes ago, CapoValley said: Why is everyone who wants Mo to play, no questions asked constantly using imprisonment as an excuse when I and other are simply saying he shouldn’t play until it’s resolved and aren’t bringing up jail once? Why are you assuming people want Mo to play no questions asked? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.