Biden Foreign Policy

[Scarlet]

Because furthering peace and cooperation between two countries who have historically had a tense relationship is something MAGA should get all frothy about.    One would think galvanizing an alliance in that part of the world as a check to China and North Korea would be welcomed.  But not if you're desperate to spread disinformation evidently.

[Guy Chamberlin]

Is there any chance Michael Seifert isn't a digital a$$h@!e selling a stupid product with a hyperbolic agenda? 

[commando]

Just now, Guy Chamberlin said:

Is there any chance Michael Seifert isn't a digital a$$h@!e selling a stupid product with a hyperbolic agenda? 

he is

[teachercd]

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

Brokering peace amongst three currently peaceful countries!   
 

 

I mean, was it the Imojin wars back like 400 years ago?  

 

They hated each other!  Ha

[Archy1221]

8 minutes ago, teachercd said:

I mean, was it the Imojin wars back like 400 years ago?  

 

They hated each other!  Ha

Ya, I mean any chance it was three friendly heads of state from countries meeting to discuss current events instead of hyperbolizing brokering peace between the three countries!   It’s like saying a President meeting with UK leaders is brokering peace discussions between the two countries.   
 

 

[ZRod]

1 hour ago, teachercd said:

I mean, was it the Imojin wars back like 400 years ago?  

 

They hated each other!  Ha

I'm pretty sure Japan effectively ruled Korea for the first half of the 20th century. Probably some harsh feelings from that, since Japan were some pretty big a-holes around that time.

 

But calling this brokering peace is a bit much.

[teachercd]

21 minutes ago, ZRod said:

I'm pretty sure Japan effectively ruled Korea for the first half of the 20th century. Probably some harsh feelings from that, since Japan were some pretty big a-holes around that time.

 

But calling this brokering peace is a bit much.

Could be!  Good call!

[BigRedBuster]

7 hours ago, teachercd said:

I mean, was it the Imojin wars back like 400 years ago?  

 

They hated each other!  Ha

You mean the Imjin war?

[teachercd]

1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said:

You mean the Imjin war?

yes

[Guy Chamberlin]

23 hours ago, Scarlet said:

Because furthering peace and cooperation between two countries who have historically had a tense relationship is something MAGA should get all frothy about.    One would think galvanizing an alliance in that part of the world as a check to China and North Korea would be welcomed.  But not if you're desperate to spread disinformation evidently.

 

While the post was a shade hyperbolic, this summit was 20% about cooperation between existing allies, and 80% a show for China. Smart people should get that. 

 

The good news is that Republicans can rest a little easier, knowing that Biden actually is tough on China, and the conservative blogosphere will now stop the relentless narrative that he isn't. 

[Archy1221]

1 hour ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

The good news is that Republicans can rest a little easier, knowing that Biden actually is tough on China, and the conservative blogosphere will now stop the relentless narrative that he isn't. 

[funhusker]

1 minute ago, Archy1221 said:

Hey!!! You caught the joke!!!

[teachercd]

We have a school trip planned to some Asian locations next year.  Anyone been to China and if so, do "they" talk about America in their news coverage like we do about them?

[Archy1221]

24 minutes ago, funhusker said:

Hey!!! You caught the joke!!!

I know, it’s why I laughed when the post was saying Biden is tough on China.  I’m happy you caught it too!!!

[Archy1221]

This isn’t specific to The Big Guys foreign policy, I just didn’t see a generic foreign policy thread.  All Administrations since Reagan bear the brunt of this.   Why does the US carry such a cost burden here?   EU and USA aren’t too far off in GDP.