NUance Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Well that right there tells me the NFL is a joke. No sh#t! Even a Jet's fan would probably say he doesn't deserve a fine... Well THAT would be a rare oddity. I mean, that somebody would be a fan of the Jets. 1 Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Matthews was fined $15,000 for his antics. Quote Link to comment
Junior Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 Well that right there tells me the NFL is a joke. No sh#t! Even a Jet's fan would probably say he doesn't deserve a fine... Well THAT would be a rare oddity. I mean, that somebody would be a fan of the Jets. Hey now... Quote Link to comment
dutch91701 Posted September 13, 2013 Share Posted September 13, 2013 That's absurd. He clearly launched himself at the guy's waist - nearly hit him there, and only hit him lower because the guy was moving away from him. The NFL cited his "repeat offender" status. I hate that being a "repeat offender" makes you get fined $100k. Now you know next time he hits someone hard they'll say "well he got fined $100k earlier this year. He obviously cant behave." How about you fine based on the actual "crime" and not a so-called "record" that you, the NFL, made up to begin with. Replay has showed that his Cutler hit was legal, his Delhome (spelling? Don't really care) hit was basically just a facemask-gone-too-far and hardly the worst one I've ever seen. 15 yards was punishment plenty for the second one. The Thanksgiving stomp looked to me like someone stomping around because they're frustrated, but hey, I'll give the NFL that one. The Matt Schaub groin kick was a stretch at best. Would've been a non-issue with any other player. Quote Link to comment
husker_99 Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 That's absurd. He clearly launched himself at the guy's waist - nearly hit him there, and only hit him lower because the guy was moving away from him. The NFL cited his "repeat offender" status. I hate that being a "repeat offender" makes you get fined $100k. Now you know next time he hits someone hard they'll say "well he got fined $100k earlier this year. He obviously cant behave." How about you fine based on the actual "crime" and not a so-called "record" that you, the NFL, made up to begin with. Replay has showed that his Cutler hit was legal, his Delhome (spelling? Don't really care) hit was basically just a facemask-gone-too-far and hardly the worst one I've ever seen. 15 yards was punishment plenty for the second one. The Thanksgiving stomp looked to me like someone stomping around because they're frustrated, but hey, I'll give the NFL that one. The Matt Schaub groin kick was a stretch at best. Would've been a non-issue with any other player. repeat offenders should not get benefit of doubt because they can't stop what they are doing. Maybe if Suh quit making boneheaded plays they might lessen it or see that he doesn't have to play that way. Even other NFL players say that Suh is a dirty player. Quote Link to comment
okaive Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I've suspected for some time that Suh may have some mental/psychological issues. Apparently he was threatening the cable guy with a pellet gun last month. No doubt the cable guy should have asked for permission first, especially at night. But there has to be a better way to handle that type of situation than the way he did. I've been incredibly disappointed with his antics and bizarre behavior since leaving Nebraska. http://www.detroitne...S0101/309110107 Seriously? If the guy was in my backyard without knocking on my door to inform me first would have had either a 9mm pointed at his temple or an AR-15 from a distance. I don't care for people trampling on my property without permission, especially at night. He would have also had my dogs charging him as soon as the door opened. I live in Oklahoma, so in Detroit I would be a lot worse on my protection. Along with how many sicko's/stalkers are out there that will do anything to get to their "hero". Quote Link to comment
Glendower Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 I've suspected for some time that Suh may have some mental/psychological issues. Apparently he was threatening the cable guy with a pellet gun last month. No doubt the cable guy should have asked for permission first, especially at night. But there has to be a better way to handle that type of situation than the way he did. I've been incredibly disappointed with his antics and bizarre behavior since leaving Nebraska. http://www.detroitne...S0101/309110107 Seriously? If the guy was in my backyard without knocking on my door to inform me first would have had either a 9mm pointed at his temple or an AR-15 from a distance. I don't care for people trampling on my property without permission, especially at night. He would have also had my dogs charging him as soon as the door opened. I live in Oklahoma, so in Detroit I would be a lot worse on my protection. Along with how many sicko's/stalkers are out there that will do anything to get to their "hero". Utilities have an easement; that type of response of that of a paranoid shut-in. Quote Link to comment
husker_99 Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 I wonder how much Suh will have to pay tomorrow? Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 NBC Sports Article Quote Link to comment
okaive Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 I've suspected for some time that Suh may have some mental/psychological issues. Apparently he was threatening the cable guy with a pellet gun last month. No doubt the cable guy should have asked for permission first, especially at night. But there has to be a better way to handle that type of situation than the way he did. I've been incredibly disappointed with his antics and bizarre behavior since leaving Nebraska. http://www.detroitne...S0101/309110107 Seriously? If the guy was in my backyard without knocking on my door to inform me first would have had either a 9mm pointed at his temple or an AR-15 from a distance. I don't care for people trampling on my property without permission, especially at night. He would have also had my dogs charging him as soon as the door opened. I live in Oklahoma, so in Detroit I would be a lot worse on my protection. Along with how many sicko's/stalkers are out there that will do anything to get to their "hero". Utilities have an easement; that type of response of that of a paranoid shut-in. Yes, utilites have an easement, but that doesn't mean that the workers can go into your backyard without proper consent at odd hours of the night. Along with that, I have been broken into once and have a hawk in my back yard that PETA loves to try to get to to set it free. So it is a free-for-all when entering my backyard. Quote Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Lions' Suh growing up, and he's better than ever. Dominant defensive tackle has dirty rep but teammates say he has cleaned up act and matured "I don't do it to get the glory. I do it to win games. I don't really care what people say. I just have to be true to who I am and continue to do what I want to do, which is play hard, attack and do what my coaches tell me." http://www.chicagotr...0,1277201.story Quote Link to comment
beanman Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 NBC Sports Article Now that's some nit-picky sh#t right there. I had to watch 4 times just to find what they were bitching about. Big effin' deal is all I gotta say. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 NBC Sports Article Now that's some nit-picky sh#t right there. I had to watch 4 times just to find what they were bitching about. Big effin' deal is all I gotta say. Who are they portraying as the victim? The Cardinal lineman? Or Suh's hand? The guy's wearin a helmet. Move along NBC, youre drunk. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Um ... I don't think the point is how much it might have hurt. It's that it's a pretty good roundhouse to the back of the guy's head. Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Um ... I don't think the point is how much it might have hurt. It's that it's a pretty good roundhouse to the back of the guy's head. He's trying to throw him to the ground there's no way that was intended to be a "punch". Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.