husker_fan_from_sweden Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Wish him the best. I think we have seen Maurice play his last game at UNL. Quote Link to comment
Husker03 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, husker_fan_from_sweden said: Wish him the best. I think we have seen Maurice play his last game at UNL. What are you talking about? This isn’t Sweden after all :p Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Moiraine said: That’s not how it works. On the child porn charge, they (likely) have proof he possessed the video, because he sent it to her. The others merely received the video unsolicited and there is no proof they still possess it. That’s only if they all received it from the same person. Which, I highly doubt. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: That’s only if they all received it from the same person. Which, I highly doubt. There are still other reasons why Washington's case is different. E.g., he did it in March, not 2 and a half years ago. He also was an adult at the time, so the consequences are different. 1 Quote Link to comment
dvdcrr Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 I don't think they should get rid of him. Unless the new kid turns out to be a hell of a back, then who cares. Kick him let him thumb back to Cali. 1 Quote Link to comment
Bigred_inSD Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, dvdcrr said: I don't think they should get rid of him. Unless the new kid turns out to be a hell of a back, then who cares. Kick him let him thumb back to Cali. Go Football! 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Railroader Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 58 minutes ago, Moiraine said: There are still other reasons why Washington's case is different. E.g., he did it in March, not 2 and a half years ago. He also was an adult at the time, so the consequences are different. Good point . . right on target regarding the real issue. Just as a side note . . . these cases are a PITA for the local PD's & district courts. So, as interstate transmission of child porn is a Federal crime & can be transferred to that system, it's way better to treat the Locals nice. The Feds don't mess around . . . the average sentence is 5 years, and the Fed system doesn't do probation or early outs (parole). So, keep it local and basically, beg for the courts leniency . . . conviction rates are near 100% because of multiple device forensics (like a fingerprint level of proof). Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 4 hours ago, brophog said: Nobody arrest any Huskers until Saunders gets back. And maybe for 5 minutes after that. I'll get the sign ready. Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 The university has released an updated statement, and it contradicts a lot of what the first statement and AD Moos originally claimed. How could they think this wouldn't get out? https://www.1011now.com/content/news/University-of-Nebraska-provides-updated-statement-on-Maurice-Washington--505853301.html Quote Link to comment
Billsantosa Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, RedDenver said: The university has released an updated statement, and it contradicts a lot of what the first statement and AD Moos originally claimed. How could they think this wouldn't get out? https://www.1011now.com/content/news/University-of-Nebraska-provides-updated-statement-on-Maurice-Washington--505853301.html It does??? I didn’t think it did 1 Quote Link to comment
WildBillMoos Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, RedDenver said: The university has released an updated statement, and it contradicts a lot of what the first statement and AD Moos originally claimed. How could they think this wouldn't get out? https://www.1011now.com/content/news/University-of-Nebraska-provides-updated-statement-on-Maurice-Washington--505853301.html Still drunk from the Wisconsin game, sorry. I'll issue a new statement during lent when I'm sober. 1 Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 9 minutes ago, Billsantosa said: It does??? I didn’t think it did The original statement claimed the university didn't know any details. And I'm pretty sure Moos said in an interview that he and the athletic department didn't know anything other than an investigator wanted to talk to Mo. Here's the first statement: 1 Quote Link to comment
Billsantosa Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 minute ago, RedDenver said: The original statement claimed the university didn't know any details. And I'm pretty sure Moos said in an interview that he and the athletic department didn't know anything other than an investigator wanted to talk to Mo. Here's the first statement: Still really not seeing it. I’ve read the reports and timelines. what Moos said still seems valid and not contradicting IMO. 3 Quote Link to comment
WildBillMoos Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Billsantosa said: Still really not seeing it. I’ve read the reports and timelines. what Moos said still seems valid and not contradicting IMO. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment
TheSker Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 25 minutes ago, RedDenver said: The university has released an updated statement, and it contradicts a lot of what the first statement and AD Moos originally claimed. How could they think this wouldn't get out? https://www.1011now.com/content/news/University-of-Nebraska-provides-updated-statement-on-Maurice-Washington--505853301.html Meh.....Moos, Vaughn and Frost can handle it however they deem best. What good does trying to snare Moos on his statements do? 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.