knapplc Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 That's not the "dirty" play everyone is talking about, is it? Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Yeah, that really doesn't look all that bad. It certainly doesn't look dirty. He lunged for the block but the guy was a little far away and the hit landed at what looks like thigh level. Jeez. Suh's got a target on his back because he's built this reputation over time. It's unfortunate. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 That's not the "dirty" play everyone is talking about, is it? That's the one he was fined $100,000 for. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 That's absurd. He clearly launched himself at the guy's waist - nearly hit him there, and only hit him lower because the guy was moving away from him. The NFL cited his "repeat offender" status. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 I hadn't seen it either. I was expecting much worse. Quote Link to comment
JTrain Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Read the Bryan Pruitt interview in No Place and Suh's block will look like a friendly game of tag. I still think it was entirely unnecessary though. Had he hit him right as the left foot was planted (a split-second difference) his knee would probably be done. And we're talking about a huge offensive lineman who had no chance to catch the ballcarrier. Legal block? Possibly. Dick move? Probably. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Dick move? Probably. Not seeing that at all. This gif and potential fine are exactly why I don't watch the NFL anymore. They made their name off players like Suh. Now they're trying to muzzle those same players with asinine rules. It's a contact sport. You strap on those pads you had better be ready to play. Fining Suh for that hit goes against 50 years of NFL practice. Calling penalties on hits that "bad" would have ruined the career of Lawrence Taylor, among dozens of others. EDIT - just caught this: @mikefreemanNFL Suh fined 100 grand by Merton Hanks, a former player, and good for Hanks. Agree with this wholeheartedly. Smart move. Hanks really sticking his neck out with this fine. 1 Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Sunday Night Football Producer: No Need To "Glorify" Big Hits Anymore Quote Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 That's not the "dirty" play everyone is talking about, is it? Wow. You know I've been disappointed in Suh for some of his previous stuff but this? Give me a break NFL and the media too. #65 was in pursuit and I would have done the exact same thing. F'em Suh. Unfortunately this is more his reputation gaining the punishment here versus the actual play I feel. Lame.... Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 What is the actual rule for low blocking? I mean... he was in the open field. I guess I always thought the rule was for blocking linemen when they were... you know, near the line. Quote Link to comment
WhatDoIKnow Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 $100K? Wow, that is extreme. I thought Suh said he even talked to the Vikings at halftime and they were OK. I agree with the poster above that is was kind of a dick move on Suh's part since it was behind the play and the center had no chance to catch the LB. Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 What is the actual rule for low blocking? I mean... he was in the open field. I guess I always thought the rule was for blocking linemen when they were... you know, near the line. Nothing below the waist in the open field I believe. Actually I don't even know if that's true, maybe it's the knee, because guys get blocked below the waist all the time in the league. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Hanks really sticking his neck out with this fine. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 My opinion is a hit on the guy is unwarranted regardless. We were saved in the Michigan St game last year by pretty much the same situation. Lets' be honest, Suh shouldntve taken the chance on it with his history. He's not doing his public personna any favors. That 300 lb center is not gonna catch that NFL backer from 10 yards back. Edit: The fine is bullsh#t though. It's utter ridiculous. The things I heard on ESPN radio today without seing it yet made me expect much worse. I'm really a bit baffled. But again, Suh has created this monster, he's really gotta start watchin his p's and q's a bit. Now, next thing is where does this lead. Is this a precedent? Where does it go with the targeting rules and such? They were just talking after a few penalties the other day that guys are simply just gonna have to start going low. Where does is now go from here? Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 That's not the "dirty" play everyone is talking about, is it? Wow. You know I've been disappointed in Suh for some of his previous stuff but this? Give me a break NFL and the media too. #65 was in pursuit and I would have done the exact same thing. F'em Suh. Unfortunately this is more his reputation gaining the punishment here versus the actual play I feel. Lame.... Wow. $100k for THAT?? Looks like Suh hits hit just under the belt, at about mid thigh. Not even close to the knees. A marginal call at best. What an incredibly bullsh#t fine. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.