Gun Control

[Archy1221]

Taking a play out of Trumps book and attacking judges.    Note the point of criticism actually comes from something his sides lawyer brought up not the judge 

 

 

[BigRedBuster]

T&P 

[DevoHusker]

 

 

[Archy1221]

23 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

T&P 

That’s awful news.   Far too many people are so wicked and sick. 

[BigRedBuster]

 

[suh_fan93]

Just crazy to me that once again one of these nuts who mows down everyone is still somehow alive himself.  Even after being confronted/arrested by law enforcement.  

 

Looking forward to seeing more Christmas postcards from all of our MAGA Republicans on the Hill with there family AR in hand pics here pretty soon. 

 

This is f'n unbelievable.  The world we live in.  The good ol' USA...

 

[suh_fan93]

 

[DevoHusker]

 

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

I don't understand the collective outrage about this. 

 

We've already determined that we accept moments like these as part of society. Tragic events are simply the price we collectively pay.

 

This one is simply going to blend in with the others and it's something we'll forget about by Christmas, after other shootings we all shrug our shoulders about. 

[Archy1221]

12 hours ago, DevoHusker said:

 

 

I wonder why his firearms weren’t taken away based on his mental issues?  

[DevoHusker]

9 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

I wonder why his firearms weren’t taken away based on his mental issues?  

 

Looks like they should have been.

[teachercd]

No guns needed except for a musket, that is it.  You can hunt and defend yourself with a musket.

 

Once again, I have solved all the problems.

 

That weirdo would have got one shot off from his musket and during the 45-60 second reloading process, he would have been tackled or everyone else would have just left that area.  

 

Problem solved.  You still get to have your guns.  Everyone wins.

[Decked]

34 minutes ago, teachercd said:

No guns needed except for a musket, that is it.  You can hunt and defend yourself with a musket.

 

Once again, I have solved all the problems.

 

That weirdo would have got one shot off from his musket and during the 45-60 second reloading process, he would have been tackled or everyone else would have just left that area.  

 

Problem solved.  You still get to have your guns.  Everyone wins.

The second amendment claims nothing about hunting. Leave no doubt.. it is to rise up and even god forbid kill anyone involved pending a tyrannical governmental regime enforcing hardships on citizens to form a well armed militia against the state. Yes, this includes troops & police officers alike. Hunting just falls under this umbrella of already having weapons. There is no right to specifically hunt. It is a luxury merely provided by the second amendment.

[ZRod]

33 minutes ago, Decked said:

The first amendment claims nothing about hunting. Leave no doubt.. it is to rise up and even god forbid kill anyone involved pending a tyrannical governmental regime enforcing hardships on citizens to form a well armed militia against the state. Yes, this includes troops & police officers alike. Hunting just falls under this umbrella of already having weapons. There is no right to specifically hunt. It is a luxury merely provided by the second amendment.

No it's not. It's about defense of the country and maintaining a well regulated militia. Which today is quite literally the national guard.

[commando]

4 minutes ago, Decked said:

The first amendment claims nothing about hunting. Leave no doubt.. it is to rise up and even god forbid kill anyone involved pending a tyrannical governmental regime enforcing hardships on citizens to form a well armed militia against the state. Yes, this includes troops & police officers alike. Hunting just falls under this umbrella of already having weapons. There is no right to specifically hunt. It is a luxury merely provided by the second amendment.

to bad all those bowlers were forming a tyrannical government.