FrantzHardySwag Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 15 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: That would mean the death rate is 35 times higher for the Corona Virus. Seems small, right? So far this year, there have been 35,000,000 cases of influenza. If it would have the same death rate, 1,225,000 people would die from the disease compared to 35,000 with the flu. That equates to 7,032 Nebraskans. Kind of puts it in perspective. Fatality Rate numbers are skewed due to people with advanced symptoms are the majority of people being tested, also we know there are many people that are symptom free. New England Journal of Medicine predicts a fatality at or less than 1%. I don’t want to down play it, as that’s still 10x more deadly than the seasonal flu, Just wanted to provide more perspective. 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 10, 2020 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 Shady, shady stuff. 2 1 Link to comment
QMany Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 https://dso.college.harvard.edu/coronavirusfaq 2 1 Link to comment
sho Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 26 minutes ago, QMany said: https://dso.college.harvard.edu/coronavirusfaq I saw Vanderbilt was cancelling classes for a week or so and Florida State is moving all classes online. Also Santa Clara County in California is cancelling all events with an estimated attendance of over 1,000. That includes San Jose Sharks NHL games. Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 10, 2020 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 OK, so UNMC is giving the Unicameral a briefing on the virus. These are sobering numbers. 480,000 deaths from this is staggering. Let's hope that's a worst-case-scenario. If not, we're all going to lose loved ones or acquaintances. Some US comparisons: The 1918 Spanish Flu - 70,000 deaths World War II - 407,000 World War I - 116,000 3 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 1 hour ago, GSG said: Does this work? I guess we all need to be in bubble wrap or better yet one of those round bubble self contained suits Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 1 hour ago, knapplc said: Shady, shady stuff. I'm gonna go ahead and guess perhaps it's the white supremacist working in the White House on immigration stuff who openly shares his disdain for brown people. 2 Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 10, 2020 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 Where's our favorite libertarian to explain why this hope hasn't been fulfilled by the private sector? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? 1 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 7 minutes ago, knapplc said: OK, so UNMC is giving the Unicameral a briefing on the virus. These are sobering numbers. 480,000 deaths from this is staggering. Let's hope that's a worst-case-scenario. If not, we're all going to lose loved ones or acquaintances. Some US comparisons: The 1918 Spanish Flu - 70,000 deaths World War II - 407,000 World War I - 116,000 What the actual f....? there is NO WAY that these numbers can be anything other than absolute worse case scare tactics....right? 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 10, 2020 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 1 minute ago, DevoHusker said: What the actual f....? there is NO WAY that these numbers can be anything other than absolute worse case scare tactics....right? I don't think so. A 0.5% mortality rate would actually be really, really low. China was reporting somewhere in the 3% range. People who understand the way epidemics work say the worst is yet to come (in America). The response to this has been delayed and in large part bungled due to Trump. He slashed the CDC response teams, and their funding, and he spent the first few weeks of the outbreak doing stupid crap like keeping a cruise ship offshore because he didn't want it to skew America's infection numbers higher. This is being handled in much smarter ways all over the world. Here... we have Trump. And other countries are just baffled by his actions. 1 Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 7 minutes ago, DevoHusker said: What the actual f....? there is NO WAY that these numbers can be anything other than absolute worse case scare tactics....right? Man I hope so! My wife can work from home and I'm sure my boys would have some online school options offered from our district, but I HAVE to go to work and as a first responder it's worrisome to hear numbers like that! 2 Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 10, 2020 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 Instead of listening to his "friends," Trump needs to listen to the experts at the CDC (and fully fund them!). 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted March 10, 2020 Author Share Posted March 10, 2020 Speaking of the CDC, here's some updates that should calm many of us (at least, those of us without older parents) Quote The CDC says "older adults" and people with serious chronic medical conditions "are at higher risk of getting very sick from this illness." Anyone over 60 and those with underlying health problems should try to avoid places with large crowds -- such as movie theaters, busy malls and even religious services, infectious disease experts say. "This ought to be top of mind for people over 60, and those with underlying health problems," said Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University professor and longtime CDC adviser. "The single most important thing you can do to avoid the virus is reduce your face to face contact with people." But why is age 60 often used as a threshold for those who need to be extra cautious? "We now know more about who is at risk," US Surgeon General Jerome Adams said. "(The) average age of death for people from coronavirus is 80. Average age of people who need medical attention is age 60." Link to comment
sho Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 Just been told by a co-worker that a confirmed case of a student at Elkhorn South HS. Kids are (based solely on mine) disgusting in their hygiene habits. I'm sure there will be many who have it now in NW Omaha. Link to comment
Recommended Posts