knapplc Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Just wait until a conference championship game, or a BCS game, with the game on the line and an ejection alters the outcome of the game. It'll take the outrage from something like that to get this stupid rule removed, or at least changed. Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Repeating this from the other thread, the subjectivity is what is really bad. I noticed watching it again that the Line Judge who was right there didn't throw the flag. It came from the Field Judge who was probably 20 yards away from the play and would have been almost directly behind SJB. and the most subjective part is the ejection call. that is the worst part about it. if you get flagged for targeting and it is a bad call, fine. there are a lot of bad calls throughout a game. but for an ejection, an incredibly harsh penalty, to be that subjective. the sjb and ole miss plays show the full continuum of targeting, and the ole miss guy's ejection was reversed. it is just asinine. Pretty much ALL calls are subjective. It is the severity of call that is a joke. If you cause another player to leave the game, then you are held out the same amount of plays - If he stays in you stay in. If his career ends - oh well Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Repeating this from the other thread, the subjectivity is what is really bad. I noticed watching it again that the Line Judge who was right there didn't throw the flag. It came from the Field Judge who was probably 20 yards away from the play and would have been almost directly behind SJB. and the most subjective part is the ejection call. that is the worst part about it. if you get flagged for targeting and it is a bad call, fine. there are a lot of bad calls throughout a game. but for an ejection, an incredibly harsh penalty, to be that subjective. the sjb and ole miss plays show the full continuum of targeting, and the ole miss guy's ejection was reversed. it is just asinine. And now two ejections in the Ole Miss/aTm game have been reversed. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Let's just call this rule what it is. Another opportunity for the NCAA and conference officials to determine the outcome of games in a major way dependence upon situational agendas. Quote Link to comment
mnhusker Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I hope they fix this rule by adding time off for the offesive player if they duck a head. I don't see why only the defense has responsability. And hey if your going to screw up the game why not go all the way. Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I hope they fix this rule by adding time off for the offesive player if they duck a head. I don't see why only the defense has responsability. And hey if your going to screw up the game why not go all the way. i brought this up earlier. The way it is now it's just good offense to initiate it. Quote Link to comment
mnhusker Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I hope they fix this rule by adding time off for the offesive player if they duck a head. I don't see why only the defense has responsability. And hey if your going to screw up the game why not go all the way. i brought this up earlier. The way it is now it's just good offense to initiate it. You are totaly right. The contact is a two way street so it would seem that both parties should be accountable for a "safe" outcome. Quote Link to comment
jaws Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 sjb made a form tackle at a high speed. A form tackle includes wrapping up which didn't happen in this hit. I highly doubt that someone gets called for targeting if they really do form tackle someone (hit, wrap, drive). Too often players are looking for the big hit and launching their bodies without proper form and that is as much on the coach as the players. I am not saying that SJB launched his body in this case. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 A form tackle includes wrapping up which didn't happen in this hit. I highly doubt that someone gets called for targeting if they really do form tackle someone (hit, wrap, drive). Too often players are looking for the big hit and launching their bodies without proper form and that is as much on the coach as the players. I am not saying that SJB launched his body in this case. i guess that was more of my point. the difference between launching and tackling really fast. sjb made a tackle coming in hot. but when you see launching, you could see how that would get called for targeting. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Just wait until a conference championship game, or a BCS game, with the game on the line and an ejection alters the outcome of the game. It'll take the outrage from something like that to get this stupid rule removed, or at least changed. If online petitions weren't the most pointless thing ever, I'd have half a mind to start an online petition. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Posted in another thread but here is a screen grab. Kind of blurry but you can see SJB's helmet hit the Purdue player's facemask. Can't really tell much from the photo above. But the gif below makes it look more like SJB hit with the shoulder. To me anyway. LINK The Purdue RB's head didn't even snap back. That was a total bullsh#t call if you ask me. 4 Quote Link to comment
I am I Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 The good news he was ejected int the first half, so he won't miss the first half next week, after bye Quote Link to comment
Thanks_Tom RR Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I was going to get into the issue of college football concussions (over 3000 a year), but this is not the forum for that. Really this rule is meant to reduce the risk to players (a noble effort), but I question its ability to be effectively executed. We will end up with outcomes like SJB (calling something that might not fit) and those in the Ole Miss game (not calling clear targeting or leading with the helmet). Quote Link to comment
funhusker Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 The reason I believe the SJB call is total BS is because later in the game Harvey Jackson did the exact same thing in tackling a receiver out in the flats, in I believe the 3rd quarter. However, the receiver held on to the ball and Jackson was praised with a nice open field tackle. Stupid, stupid, stupid..... 2 Quote Link to comment
Dagerow Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Posted in another thread but here is a screen grab. Kind of blurry but you can see SJB's helmet hit the Purdue player's facemask. Can't really tell much from the photo above. But the gif below makes it look more like SJB hit with the shoulder. To me anyway. LINK The Purdue RB's head didn't even snap back. That was a total bullsh#t call if you ask me. Good call. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.