Leaderboard

No we wouldn’t

They make a good point https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/how-does-wandale-robinson-fit-in-this-offense.278854/

Well, I don’t quite agree with you, either. I don’t like it when fans don’t want to give credit to their team. That’s part of the game, and we capitalized. We’re good enough to do that now. 4-5 weeks ago we weren’t. Not aiming this at you in particular but speaking in general - It seems like a lot of fans say Nebraska deserved to lose if they turned it over a bunch and lost, then they say Nebraska deserved to lose when the other team turned it over a bunch and we won. It shouldn’t work both ways.

The young people of the 1920s were the drunkest, laziest, and most entitled America had ever seen. And all the adults piled into the stock market uninformed and wanting to get something for nothing. That didn't work out so well. The Greatest Generation was Great because they didn't have a choice. They had the Depression and World War II thrust upon them. The teens and twenty somethings in the 1960s probably did set the precedent for what we have today, but some of that is a profound improvement. This has been going on forever. The only thing new is the term "snowflake" which also describes the millions of people throughout history who didn't take criticism well.

we'd give alabama a hell of a game. this team has reached a new level.

I could just as easily say Brian Kemp is stealing the election in Georgia with his monumental, historic voter suppression tactics. Particularly of black voters. I noticed you didn't really say sh#t about that.

well, I learned the following, starting with the positive first: (1) We have a very special offense and we can play with the best of them. We can score on anyone. (2) Adrian Martinez is a STUD and he will only get better. He might be our best shot to have another Heisman winner in almost two decades. (3) Spielman and Stanley are NFL caliber receivers and we will be seeing Stanley in the NFL next year. (4) We can actually block a punt...yeah (5) Our defense is horrible against the run...they are really struggling and that has cost us a few games this year. We simply struggle to stop good running backs even when we know they will be carrying the ball. (6) Saying that our kicker is bad is an understatement of the year...WE NEED A DECENT KICKER VERY SOON. (7) Our special teams are still work in progress but they showed some improvements today. (8) We need our defense to show up next week early because if we let Michigan State start quick, it will be hard for us to score on their defense. (9) We still commit too many penalties with some being silly with bad timing. (10) I never thought I would be so happy and hopeful with a 3-7 record but this is the most exciting 3-7 team in the country. Go Big Red!

What? Mills isn't big enough but Mazour is gonna fill his spot? That makes no sense. Also people need to give up on mazour turning into rex burkhead. What? Mills isn't big enough but Mazour is gonna fill his spot? That makes no sense. Also people need to give up on mazour turning into rex burkhead. What? Mills isn't big enough but Mazour is gonna fill his spot? That makes no sense. Also people need to give up on mazour turning into rex burkhead.

Someone like Juco RB Dedrick Mills who is also currently committed to the Huskers perhaps?

We needed the ball to bounce our way to hang with Illinois. Fun offense, absolutely, but maybe we should pump the brakes a bit.

wait...you are the expert on everything and you have to ask me? i would think someone who knows more about the law than the lawyers do, more about economics than the economists do, more about science than the scientist do, and more about google than google does, wouldn't have to ask me that question.

Let's see how many adjustments are made by the defense.

I wish this announcer would just shut up. Ya, Osborne wanted to kick a field goal down 7 with 12 seconds left.

Where is that poster who was defending Chin? 3rd and 23 and I could have ran for 12-15 yards. Dude is an average coach at best

175 more minutes of Young.

I’m not a professor, and I never did any of those things. I demerit anecdotes when people use them incorrectly. They can used to prove something wrong. E.g. if someone says eggs never crack, I can hand them a broken egg and one example works to prove it wrong. If someone tries to compare one generation of teenagers to some other undefined generation of teenagers and says something like “One time I saw this kid wearing his pants funny and he rolled his eyes at me. Kids these days!” to prove that kids these days in general are bad then it is absolutely worthless. Of course they shape a person’s worldview, but if you know what they are you don’t use them as proof of anything which is what you’re doing. I used anecdotes myself when saying most of the ones I’ve been around are fine. This isn’t proof they’re all fine or even most are but I’m not the one whining about a generation of people in a football forum based on a few anecdotes. The most likely reality is every generation of old farts pisses and moans like “snowflakes” over those darned young people. Also, the term “snowflakes” usually precedes a bunch of drivel and gives me an idea of where you got your ideas on this age group from. Btw, I looked up college football transfer rates and they are basically flat for the past 14 years. They are 0.6% higher now than they were in 2004. I couldn’t find data from before that.

Rule changes have made this the norm. Nebraska will be just fine under Frost/Chinander.

When did the "lock down, Blackshirt" defense come? Because "more than a few" we're ready to run Charlie McBride out of town once upon a time. Chinander has coached less than one full season at Nebraska as of today. Please enlighten us......

Defensive approach is fine, we just need athletes to fill certain positions. With this offense, the idea will be to bend and not break, and get turnovers to put the ball back in the offense's hands. Talent needs to be improved at NT, OLB, CB and Safety; in other terms: upgrades are needed at a ton of positions.

Only 1 of our top 9 recruits according to 247C is a defender

The problem with that is 90+% of your claims turn out to be false and therefore the burden of proof shouldn't be on others to verify which of the small % of your claims is true.

This offense is going to give Iowa fits. That's the game I really want us to win.

I think ziggy may have earned himself a spot on an nfl roster with the way he’s played this year. What a pleasant surprise he has been

you sound rather racist in this post.

Someone like Lamar or Cam should be returning punts.... we don’t need JD getting injured considering what we’re getting in punt returns.

Ozigbo deserves an extra year due to dimwitted coaching.

We were basically gifted a TD and are trying to piss it down our leg.

This defense cant even stop a guy that was 4tg string at his last school and is almost zero threat to pass

Frost has said the thing Washington needs most is the off-season.

Maybe get a more athletic linebacker or domann to spy on Bush. Average passer, good runner. Our O-line isn’t that talented and they competed well against OSU last week. Coaching does help.

Time to spy bush

Scott Frost is. Any further questions?

Time for the defense to force a turnover

I believe around 5% of it is lately and it’ll increase slightly. Once the boomers die it could probably easily be fully funded by SS tax again. But I was going to make a similar comment. People who think SS is some huge problem that’s dragging the country down (“The number one long term liability facing our country our entitelement programs like Social Security and Medicare”) can’t possibly understand how it works. And the reduction in payments could be pushed back many years, and the % from the general fund reduced to 0, if they got rid of the cap on the tax.

So they don't despute that he won the election. Again, please provide evidence for your claim that they do not accept the results of the election.

Almost everything posted above is either straight-up wrong, or missing the crucial piece of context.

Nobody gives a single s#!t about your silly opinion about how terrible the damned youths of America are. Read the thread title and get back on topic - unless you wanna tell us how Adrian Martinez is immature/lazy/irresponsible/snowflake.

People then were posting this picture and asking what changes could be seen. Oh, wait, I guess they weren't posting anything, except letters at the post office.

The real problem are those that subscribe to CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, Wash Post, Slate, Huff Post and more and then regurgitate those talking points on boards like these.

Have a Blackshirt day, everyone!

20 commits right now. 24 open spots plus however many over-signs. Word is we are taking 30 - though a couple might be grad transfers. Current Scholarships/Commits QB - 1 - LUKE McCAFFREY RB - 3 - RAHMIR JOHNSON, RONALD THOMPKINS, JUCO DEDRICK MILLS WR - 3-4 - JAMIE NANCE, DARIEN CHASE, Zay Flowers, Jarrad Baker TE - 1-2 - CHRIS HICKMAN, Skylar Loving-Black OT - 4-5 - MATTHEW ANDERSON, MICHAEL LYNN, BRYCE BENHART, JUCO Keenan Walker, JUCO Myron Cunningham OG/C - 1-2 - JUCO DESMOND BLAND NT - 1-2 - JUCO TONY FAIR DE - 3-4 - ETHAN PIPER, MOSAI NEWSOM, Ty Robinson, Brant Banks ILB - 2-3 - JACKSON HANNAH, NICK HENRICH OLB - 2-3 - GARRETT SNODGRASS, GARRETT NELSON, JUCO Dru Mathis CB - 2-3 - QUINTON NEWSOME, JAVIN WRIGHT, Tavian Mayo, Myles Bell S - 2 - Jamel Starks, Noa Pola-Gates, Josh Sanguinetti, JUCO Markquese Bell ATH - Jalen Cropper   Early Enrollees: McCaffrey, Mills, Nance, Hickman, Bland, Fair, Nelson

Disrespecting the military only counts if you're a self deprecating comedian on SNL.....if you're a commander-in-chief or acting attorney general, it's okay to scam veterans, attack the parents of a deceased bronze star veteran, and mock a POW for being captured. Did you even take civics class????? Day one stuff.

You're thinking of Animal House. And that was set in 1962.

Presidential Debate Strategy I was having a discussion with a friend yesterday about this; I think Democrats absolutely need someone who can handle their own in the debate. I'm not saying out-Trump Donald's WWF antics. But they need to be informed, blunt, and somewhat entertaining. By all accounts, HRC dominated Trump on policy, facts, and logic. But that isn't what people saw. The highlights were 10-second antics (mostly lies). You have to be able to combat that. For example, if law enforcement is the topic: "I support our boys in blue. He attacks our FBI for doing their job. Campaign Chair, CONVICTED 8X. National security advise, PLED GUILTY. Foreign policy adviser, PLED GUILTY. Campaign Aide, PLED GUILTY. His own attorney pled guilty and accused him of federal crimes. Trump doesn't support law enforcement, because he runs a criminal enterprise." Long eloquent speeches and policy wonk talk don't cut it in that arena. Unfortunately, we live in a reality TV era and people want to be entertained, not educated.